Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 7;12(2):145–155. doi: 10.1159/000527403

Table 2.

MAIC results for efficacy outcomes

RESORCE Rego (ESS = 214) versus placebo (ESS = 82) CELESTIAL Cabo (N = 241) versus placebo (N = 117)a Rego versus cabo
OS (months)
 Overall HR (95% CI) 0.59 (0.44, 0.79) 0.74 (0.56, 0.97) 0.80 (0.54, 1.20)
 RMST difference (95% CI) at 37.3 months 5.42 (2.91, 7.94) 2.67 (−0.16, 5.50) 2.76 (−1.03, 6.54)
 RMST ratio (95% CI) at 37.3 months 1.58 (1.25, 1.99) 1.21 (0.98, 1.50) 1.30 (0.95, 1.79)
 RMST difference (95% CI)b 6.01 (3.01, 9.01) 2.67 (−0.16, 5.50) 3.34 (−0.78, 7.46)
 RMST ratio (95% CI)b 1.61 (1.24, 2.10) 1.21 (0.98, 1.50) 1.33 (0.95, 1.87)
PFS (months)
 Overall HR (95% CI) 0.43 (0.32, 0.57) 0.43 (0.33, 0.55) 1.00 (0.68, 1.49)
 RMST difference (95% CI) at 15.2 months 2.51 (1.63, 3.39) 3.10 (2.22, 3.97) −0.59 (−1.83, 0.65)
 RMST ratio (95% CI) at 15.2 months 1.98 (1.51, 2.59) 1.87 (1.54, 2.28) 1.06 (0.76, 1.48)
 RMST difference (95% CI)c 2.51 (1.63, 3.39) 3.38 (2.28, 4.47) −0.87 (−2.27, 0.54)
 RMST ratio (95% CI)c 1.98 (1.51, 2.59) 1.91 (1.51, 2.41) 1.04 (0.72, 1.48)

Cabo, cabozantinib; CI, confidence interval; ESS, effective sample size; HR, hazard ratio; MAIC, matching-adjusted indirect comparison; rego, regorafenib; RMST, restricted mean survival time.

a

Derived from recreated individual patient data from ref. [17].

b

Truncation time for RMST analyses was 50.6 months for RESORCE and 37.3 months for CELESTIAL, representing the minimum of the longest observed time between arms within each trial.

c

Truncation time for RMST analyses was 15.2 months for RESORCE and 22.2 months for CELESTIAL, representing the minimum of the longest observed time between arms within each trial.