Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 5;18:100247. doi: 10.1016/j.metop.2023.100247

Table 1.

Characteristics of the included studies in the systematic review and meta-analysis for the global prevalence of sexual dysfunction among diabetic patients.

Author/Year Country Setting Design Sample size Prevalence DM Type Sex Quality
Asefa et al., /2019 Ethiopia Institutional Cross-sectional 398 53.3% Any DM Both Low-risk
Vafaeimanesh et al., /2014 Iran Institutional Cross-sectional 110 53.6% Type2 Female Low-risk
Ogbera et al., /2009 Nigeria Institutional Case-control 94 88% Type2 Female Low-risk
BC Unadike/2009 Nigeria Institutional Cross-sectional 225 58% Any DM Males Low-risk
E.Tuncel/2016 Turkish Institutional Cross-sectional 93 55.9% Type 2 Female Low-risk
Getie Mekonen et al. Ethiopia Institutional Cross-sectional 416 69.5% Any DM Male Low-risk
Ewelina Bak et al., /2017 Poland Institutional Case-control 114 68% Type 2 Female Low-risk
Forouzan Elyasi/2015 Iran Institutional Cross-sectional 150 78.7% Type 2 Female Low-risk
Geoffrey M/2012 Kenya Institutional Cross-sectional 164 36.6% Any DM Female Low-risk
Giuseppe Derosa/2023 Italy Institutional Cross-sectional 77 87% Type 2 Female Low-risk
K Esposito/2010 Italy Institutional Cross-sectional 593 53.4% Type 2 Female Low-risk
Ziaei-Rad et al., /2011 Iran Institutional Case-control 200 82.5% Type 2 Both Low-risk
Owiredu et al., /2011 Ghana Institutional Cross-sectional 280 69.3% Any DM Males Low-risk
Paul Enzlin/2009 America Institutional Cohort 424 35.4% Type 1 Female Low-risk
Omidvar et al., /2013 Iran Institutional Cross-sectional 500 32.3% Any DM Female Low-risk