Table 1.
Relative effects of the intervention as estimated from the network meta-analysis model, with 1 (a) and 2/more (b) years of follow-up. The lower triangle shows the result of the network meta-analysis and the upper triangle shows the result of the paired meta-analysis
| a. 1 year | b. 2/more year | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACTIVA | 7.47 (0.36,154.12) | AAG | 1.88 (1.14, 3.10) | 1.70 (0.97, 2.97) | 1.14 (0.43, 3.05) | ||||
| 22.80 (0.89,584.13) | GIC | 0.33 (0.10, 1.06) | 0.39 (0.08, 1.98) | 0.56 (0.10, 3.21) | COMPOMER | 1.56 (0.26, 9.37) | 2.52 (0.26,24.20) | ||
| 7.47 (0.36,154.12) | 0.33 (0.10, 1.05) | RC | 1.85 (0.68, 5.06) | 1.88 (1.14, 3.10) | 3.37 (0.55,20.72) | FAAG | |||
| 12.56 (0.52,303.50) | 0.55 (0.14, 2.21) | 1.68 (0.62, 4.53) | RMGIC | 1.79 (1.04, 3.09) | 3.20 (0.59,17.33) | 0.95 (0.45, 2.00) | GIC | 0.45 (0.23, 0.87) | 0.92 (0.43, 1.98) |
| 0.89 (0.42, 1.92) | 1.60 (0.32, 8.05) | 0.47 (0.19, 1.19) | 0.50 (0.28, 0.91) | RC | 1.36 (0.64, 2.92) | ||||
| 1.34 (0.64, 2.83) | 2.40 (0.46,12.61) | 0.71 (0.29, 1.75) | 0.75 (0.39, 1.43) | 1.50 (0.79, 2.85) | RMGIC | ||||
RRs < 1 favor treatment on the left and > 1 favor treatment on the right