Table 2.

Relative effects of the intervention as estimated from the network meta-analysis model. The lower triangle shows the result of the network meta-analysis and the upper triangle shows the result of the paired meta-analysis

AAG	0.33 (0.04, 3.06)	1.25 (0.71, 2.17)			2.42 (1.28, 4.58)
1.46 (0.75,2.85)	COMPOMER	0.69 (0.17, 2.85)	1.32 (0.38, 4.53)	1.06 (0.64, 1.77)	1.77 (0.79, 3.97)
1.28 (0.78,2.11)	0.88 (0.50,1.54)	GIC		1.17 (0.76, 1.81)	4.00 (0.47,33.91)
1.48 (0.43,5.13)	1.01 (0.33,3.15)	1.15 (0.35,3.84)	GIONOMER	2.10 (0.41,10.84)	1.69 (0.33, 8.66)
1.54 (0.86,2.76)	1.05 (0.66,1.69)	1.20 (0.81,1.78)	1.04 (0.32,3.33)	RC	1.12 (0.43, 2.93)
2.46 (1.42,4.27)	1.68 (0.87,3.25)	1.92 (1.03,3.56)	1.66 (0.49,5.61)	1.60 (0.85,3.00)	RMGIC

RRs < 1 favor treatment on the left and > 1 favor treatment on the right