Table 5.
Summary of findings: outcome in deciduous teeth with a follow-up of 02/more years
| Secondary Caries outcome in deciduous teeth with a follow-up of 02/more years | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Patient or population: Deciduos teeth Interventions: AAG: Dental Amalgam; GIC: Glass Ionomer Cement; RMGIC: Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement; RC: Resin Composite; COMPOMER; GIOMER |
|
||||
| Interventions |
Anticipated absolute effects with intervention |
Relative effect (95% CI) | № of participants (studies) | Certainty of the evidence (GRADE) | Ranking |
| RC | 13 per 100 | RR 1.60c (0.85 to 3.00) | 438 (8 Clinical Trials) |
⨁⨁◯◯ Lowa,b |
2º—P-score = 0.58 |
| COMPOMER | 15 per 100 | RR 1.68c (0.87 to 3.25) | 207 (5 Clinical Trials) |
⨁⨁◯◯ Lowa,b |
3º—P-score = 0.50 |
| GIONOMER | 8 per 100 | RR 1.66c (0.49 to 5.61) | 38 (1 Clinical Trial) |
⨁⨁◯◯ Lowa,b |
4º—P-score = 0.50 |
| GIC | 5 per 100 | RR 1.92c (1.03 to 3.56) | 1193 (7 Clinical Trials) |
⨁⨁⨁◯ Moderatea |
5º—P-score = 0.35 |
| AAG | 5 per 100 | RR 2.46c (1.42 to 4.27) | 1135 (8 Clinical Trials) |
⨁⨁⨁◯ Moderatea |
1º—P-score = 0.13 |
aOne-level reduction due to some concerns regarding the risk of bias in the primary studies
bOne-level reduction due to imprecision
cThe relative effect is based on comparison with RMGIC