Table 3.
Univariate logistic analysis of predictors of cVA | Multivariate analysis stepwise based on p model** | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR | 95% CI | P value | OR | 95% CI | P value | |
MR regurgitant fraction (%) | 89.40 | 0.66–1.22 | 0.0723 | – | – | – |
LGE | 9.52 | 2.28–39.7 | 0. 002 | 8.5 | 1.9–38.2 | 0.008 |
Number of LGE segments | 1.78 | 1.21–2.63 | 0.004 | – | – | – |
MAD length | 1.18 | 0.97–1.44 | 0.087 | – | – | – |
Mean native T1 relaxation time (ms) | 1.01 | 0.97–1.03 | 0.130 | – | – | – |
Native T1 relaxation time of inferolateral wall (ms) | 1.01 | 1.00–1.02 | 0.038 | – | – | – |
Native T1 relaxation time of inferior wall (ms) | 1.01 | 0.99–1.02 | 0.256 | – | – | – |
Mean ECV | 1.24 | 0.08–1.87 | 0.222 | – | – | – |
ECV inferior wall | 1.11 | 0.01–3.64 | 0.127 | – | – | – |
ECV inferolateral wall | 1.12 | 1.22–1.98 | 0.047 | – | – | – |
GLS (%) | 1.58 | 1.21–2.07 | 0.0009 | 1.6 | 1.45–2.47 | 0.007 |
LS basal Inferior wall (%) | 1.11 | 1.00–1.23 | 0.545 | 1.6 | 1.22–2.13 | 0.0007 |
LS midventricular Inferior wall (%) | 1.05 | 0.97–1.13 | 0.185 | – | – | – |
LS basal inferolateral wall (%) | 1.11 | 1.00–1.23 | 0.047 | – | – | – |
LS midventricular inferolateral wall (%) | 1.62 | 1.22–2.13 | 0.0007 | – | – | – |
CS (%) | 1.13 | 0.98–1.29 | 0.077 | – | – | – |
CS basal inferolateral wall (%) | 9.52 | 2.28–39.70 | 0. 001 | – | – | – |
CS mid-ventricular inferolateral wall (%) | 1.41 | 1.16–1.72 | 0.0005 | – | – | – |
CS basal inferior wall (%) | 1.00 | 1.000–1.010 | 0.0675 | – | – | – |
CS midventricular inferior wall (%) | 3.58 | 0.8760–14.60 | 0.0759 | 2.1 | 1.87–3.17 | 0.006 |
MR mitral regurgitation, LGE late gadolinium enhancement, MAD mitral annular disjunction, ECV extracellular volume fraction, GLS global longitudinal strain, LS longitudinal strain, GCS global circumferential strain, CS circumferential strain
*Hosmer and Lemeshow goodness of fit (GOF) test: X-squared = 7.5543, df = 8, p-value = 0.4446. Percentage correct 92.68%