Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 15;25:32. doi: 10.1186/s12968-023-00944-x

Table 3.

univariate and multivariate analysis of predictors of c-VA

Univariate logistic analysis of predictors of cVA Multivariate analysis stepwise based on p model**
OR 95% CI P value OR 95% CI P value
MR regurgitant fraction (%) 89.40 0.66–1.22 0.0723
LGE 9.52 2.28–39.7 0. 002 8.5 1.9–38.2 0.008
Number of LGE segments 1.78 1.21–2.63 0.004
MAD length 1.18 0.97–1.44 0.087
Mean native T1 relaxation time (ms) 1.01 0.97–1.03 0.130
Native T1 relaxation time of inferolateral wall (ms) 1.01 1.00–1.02 0.038
Native T1 relaxation time of inferior wall (ms) 1.01 0.99–1.02 0.256
Mean ECV 1.24 0.08–1.87 0.222
ECV inferior wall 1.11 0.01–3.64 0.127
ECV inferolateral wall 1.12 1.22–1.98 0.047
GLS (%) 1.58 1.21–2.07 0.0009 1.6 1.45–2.47 0.007
LS basal Inferior wall (%) 1.11 1.00–1.23 0.545 1.6 1.22–2.13 0.0007
LS midventricular Inferior wall (%) 1.05 0.97–1.13 0.185
LS basal inferolateral wall (%) 1.11 1.00–1.23 0.047
LS midventricular inferolateral wall (%) 1.62 1.22–2.13 0.0007
CS (%) 1.13 0.98–1.29 0.077
CS basal inferolateral wall (%) 9.52 2.28–39.70 0. 001
CS mid-ventricular inferolateral wall (%) 1.41 1.16–1.72 0.0005
CS basal inferior wall (%) 1.00 1.000–1.010 0.0675
CS midventricular inferior wall (%) 3.58 0.8760–14.60 0.0759 2.1 1.87–3.17 0.006

MR mitral regurgitation, LGE late gadolinium enhancement, MAD mitral annular disjunction, ECV extracellular volume fraction, GLS global longitudinal strain, LS longitudinal strain, GCS global circumferential strain, CS circumferential strain

*Hosmer and Lemeshow goodness of fit (GOF) test: X-squared = 7.5543, df = 8, p-value = 0.4446. Percentage correct 92.68%