Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 2;8(23):21172–21181. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c02248

Table 1. Crystal and Structure Refinement Data.

empirical formula LiNa11B28O48 Li1.45Na7.55B21O36 Li2Na4Ca7Sr2B13O27F9
temperature 297.15 K 273.15 K 273.15 K
crystal system, space group hexagonal, P63/mcm hexagonal, P63/mcm hexagonal, P63/m
unit cell dimensions a = 9.50430(10) Å a = 9.3446(3) Å a = 9.32940(10) Å
b = 9.50430(10) Å b = 9.3446(3) Å b = 9.32940(10) Å
c = 25.0041(3) Å c = 20.2013(10) Å b = 19.5978(5) Å
volume 1956.06(5) Å3 1527.68(12) Å3 1477.22(5) Å3
Z, calculated density 2, 2.259 g·cm–3 2, 2.145 g·cm–3 2, 2.934 g·cm–3
crystal size 0.059 × 0.078 × 0.081 mm3 0.11 × 0.12 × 0.15 mm3 0.102 × 0.103 × 0.112 mm3
absorption coefficient 2.894 mm–1 0.286 mm–1 5.053 mm–1
F (000) 1296 961 1256
radiation Cu Kα (λ = 1.54178) Mo Kα (λ = 0.71073) Mo Kα (λ = 0.71073)
θ range for data collection 3.54 to 68.3° 2.016 to 17.483° 2.016 to 17.483°
limiting indices –11 ≤ h ≤ 10, –9 ≤ k ≤ 11, –19 ≤ l ≤ 30 –12 ≤ h ≤ 12, –11 ≤ k ≤ 12, –26 ≤ l ≤ 26 –9 ≤ h ≤ 12, –12 ≤ k ≤ 12, –25 ≤ l ≤ 25
reflections collected/unique 14 995/688 [Rint = 0.0578] 11 789/669 [Rint = 0.0862] 9997/1164 [Rint = 0.0390]
data/restraints/parameters 688/6/96 669/0/69 1164/0/104
goodness-of-fit on F2 1.216 1.031 1.155
final R indices [Fo2 > 2σ(Fo2)]a R1 = 0.0625, wR2 = 0.1347 R1 = 0.0321, wR2 = 0.0851 R1 = 0.0290, wR2 = 0.0769
largest diff. peak and hole 0.44 and –0.63 e·Å–3 0.91 and –0.76 e·Å–3 1.09 and –0.68 e·Å–3
a

R1 = ∑||Fo| – |F|| / ∑|Fo| and wR2 = [∑w(Fo2Fc2)2 / ∑wFo4]1/2 for Fo2 > 2σ(Fo2).