Skip to main content
. 2023 May 1;11(3):e00264-23. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00264-23

TABLE 4.

Comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of the Aspergillus IgG LFA and ELISAa

Parameter LFA ELISA P
Specificity, % (n/total)
 Non-CPAb (n = 55) 92.7 (51/55) 89.1 (49/55) 0.507
Sensitivity, % (n/total)
 CPA (n = 116) 54.3 (63/116) 55.2 (64/116) 0.895
A. fumigatus (n = 39) 87.2 (34/39) 74.4 (29/39) 0.151
 non-A. fumigatusc (n = 12) 8.3 (1/12) 66.7 (8/12) 0.009
 CCPAd (n = 53) 75.5 (40/53) 67.9 (36/53) 0.388
 CNPA (n = 20) 55.0 (11/20) 75.0 (15/20) 0.185
 SA (n = 11) 27.3 (3/11) 36.4 (4/11) 1.000
 AN (n = 32) 28.1 (9/32) 28.1 (9/32) 1.000
a

LFA, lateral flow assay; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; CPA, chronic pulmonary aspergillosis; CCPA, chronic cavitary pulmonary aspergillosis; CNPA, chronic necrotizing pulmonary aspergillosis; SA, simple aspergilloma; AN, Aspergillus nodule. P was calculated using Pearson’s chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate.

b

Non-CPA controls included diseased patients with cryptococcosis (n = 27), mucormycosis (n = 9), mycobacterial lung disease (n = 5), lung cancer (n = 4), nocardiosis (n = 3), penicilliosis (n = 2), histoplasmosis (n = 2), chromomycosis (n = 1), coccidioidomycosis (n = 1), and actinomycosis (n = 1).

c

Non-A. fumigatus cases included 2 A. flavus and 10 A. niger.

d

Two patients diagnosed with chronic fibrosing pulmonary aspergillosis were included.