TABLE 4.
Comparing contact tracing and genomic epidemiology in studying the outbreaka
| Ward or no. of events or cases | Contact tracing | Genomic epidemiology |
|---|---|---|
| Ward A | No. of cases: 23 | No. of cases sequenced: 9
|
| First case: 3 December 2020 Last case: 31 December 2020 |
First case: 3 December 2020 Last case: Earliest 22 December 2020 |
|
| Physiotherapist moving between wards A and B (directionality unknown) Source: unclear if it is ward B |
||
| Ward B | No. of cases: 3 | No. of cases sequenced: 3
|
| First case: 3 December 2020 Last case: 4 December 2020 |
||
| Physiotherapist moving between wards A and B (directionality unknown) Source: unclear if it is ward A |
||
| Ward C | No. of cases: 19 | No. of cases sequenced: 11
|
| First case: 4 December 2020 Last case: 29 December 2020 |
First case: 6 December 2020 (date of first B.1.564.1 case) Last case: Earliest, 20 December 2020 (date of last B.1.564.1 case) |
|
| No community importations | At least 2 community importations | |
| Four patients in ward C were exposed to two COVID-positive patients in ward A Source: ward A |
||
| Ward D | No. of cases: 9 One of the two earliest cases had no direct epidemiological link to other cases |
No. of cases sequenced: 8
Since the two earliest cases were B.1.564.1 and B.1, it suggests that B.1 sample is the one that has no direct epidemiological link to other cases. |
| First case: 10 December 2020 Last case: 22 December 2020 |
First case: 10 December 2020 Last case: Earliest, 17 December 2020 (last B.1.564.1 case) |
|
| No community importation | At least 1 community importation | |
| Source: unclear | ||
| Ward E | No. of cases: 4 All patients exposed to one COVID positive HCW |
No. of cases sequenced: 3
Case with B.1.231 lineage is likely due to community importation or exposure to different patient or HCW |
| First case: 10 December 2020 Last case: 20 December 2020 |
First case: 19 December 2020 (first B.1.564.1 case) Last case: 20 December 2020 (last B.1.564.1 case) |
|
| No community importations | At least 1 community importation | |
| Source: COVID-positive HCW | ||
| No. of cases in the outbreak | All cases (n = 106) | At least all sequenced B.1.564.1 lineage (n = 55) |
| Index case | Unknown | |
| No. of importations into hospital | At least 1 | At least 9 (1 from each lineage in Table 3) |
| No. of within-room transmission events | 15 | 5 |
| No. of neighboring room-to-room transmission events | Ward A: 5 Ward B: 1 Ward C: 7 Ward D: 1 Ward E: 2 |
Ward A: 3 Ward B: 1 Ward C: 2 Ward D: 0 Ward E: 1 |
Concordances and differences between contract tracing and genomic epidemiology are indicated by merged and split cells, respectively. One within-room transmission event in contact tracing is counted as at least two COVID-positive patients in one room with positive tests within a 20-day transmission range. We observed whether genomic epidemiology supports these contact tracing room transmission events by establishing the number of events where lineage assignment was B.1.564.1. Similarly, we counted neighboring room-to-room transmission contact tracing events as adjacent rooms with at least two COVID-positive patients within a 20-day transmission range. Last, we identified support for neighboring room-to-room transmission contact tracing events if the lineage for these sequences was B.1.564.1. All of the contact tracing transmission events that could not be supported by genomics was attributed to not sequencing all patient samples.