Skip to main content
Microbiology Spectrum logoLink to Microbiology Spectrum
. 2023 May 8;11(3):e05255-22. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.05255-22

The Small Protein ScrA Influences Staphylococcus aureus Virulence-Related Processes via the SaeRS System

Marcus A Wittekind a, Paul Briaud a, Jayanna L Smith a, Julia R Tennant a, Ronan K Carroll a,
Editor: Mariola J Ferrarob
PMCID: PMC10269730  PMID: 37154710

ABSTRACT

Staphylococcus aureus is a Gram-positive commensal and opportunistic pathogen able to cause diseases ranging from mild skin infections to life-threatening endocarditis and toxic shock syndrome. The ability to cause such an array of diseases is due to the complex S. aureus regulatory network controlling an assortment of virulence factors, including adhesins, hemolysins, proteases, and lipases. This regulatory network is controlled by both protein and RNA elements. We previously identified a novel regulatory protein called ScrA, which, when overexpressed, leads to the increased activity and expression of the SaeRS regulon. In this study, we further explore the role of ScrA and examine the consequences to the bacterial cell of scrA gene disruption. These results demonstrate that scrA is required for several virulence-related processes, and in many cases, the phenotypes of the scrA mutant are inverse to those observed in cells overexpressing ScrA. Interestingly, while the majority of ScrA-mediated phenotypes appear to rely on the SaeRS system, our results also indicate that ScrA may also act independently of SaeRS when regulating hemolytic activity. Finally, using a murine model of infection, we demonstrate that scrA is required for virulence, potentially in an organ-specific manner.

IMPORTANCE Staphylococcus aureus is the cause of several potentially life-threatening infections. An assortment of toxins and virulence factors allows such a wide range of infections. However, an assortment of toxins or virulence factors requires complex regulation to control expression under all of the different conditions encountered by the bacterium. Understanding the intricate web of regulatory systems allows the development of novel approaches to combat S. aureus infections. Here, we have shown that the small protein ScrA, which was previously identified by our laboratory, influences several virulence-related functions through the SaeRS global regulatory system. These findings add ScrA to the growing list of virulence regulators in S. aureus.

KEYWORDS: SaeRS, ScrA, Staphylococcus aureus, clumping, gene regulation, hemolysis, two-component system, virulence

INTRODUCTION

Staphylococcus aureus is a Gram-positive commensal bacterium responsible for a wide variety of human diseases ranging from skin and soft tissue infections to life-threatening endocarditis and bacterial septicemia (1). The ability of S. aureus to infect a variety of human tissues is due to an extensive array of virulence factors, including hemolysins, adhesins, proteases, and lipases. The regulation of these virulence factor genes is mediated by a complex network of regulators comprised of both RNA- and protein-based systems. Among these regulatory elements are two-component signal transduction systems (TCSs). S. aureus encodes 16 TCSs, which respond to a variety of activation signals and regulate several key biological processes (26). Of the 16 TCSs present in S. aureus, several have been implicated in the regulation of virulence genes, including the Agr, Arl, and Sae systems (713). Of particular interest to us is the SaeRS system, which controls the expression of secreted virulence determinants, including hemolysins such as hlgABC and hla, proteases such as aureolysin, the toxic shock syndrome toxin, and immune evasion components such as nucleases and lipases. The disruption of the SaeRS system leads to the reduced production of secreted virulence factors (10, 14, 15), attenuation of virulence (1618), and impaired biofilm development (4, 1821).

The SaeRS system includes the SaeS sensor kinase, which has been postulated to act as an intramembrane sensor (22, 23), and the cytoplasmic SaeR response regulator. SaeR target genes have two well-defined promoters, termed class I and class II, composed of varying repeats of a conserved binding sequence (2, 16). The Sae system also consists of the accessory regulators SaeP and SaeQ, which act to modulate the system by influencing SaeS phosphatase activity. Consequently, SaePQ play an important role in returning the system to a prestimulation state (2, 19, 24). Although SaePQ are known to induce phosphatase activity in SaeS, little else is known about the proteins, including potential alternative interaction partners.

We previously identified a positive regulator of the Sae system, the small protein ScrA, which increases Sae activity through an undetermined mechanism (25). The overexpression of scrA led to (i) the rapid agglutination of bacterial cells, (ii) decreased membrane stability, and (iii) an increase in the hemolytic activity of the culture supernatants (all in an Sae-dependent manner). Although our previous study described these phenotypes, the specific bacterial virulence factors underlying them were not identified. Furthermore, our previous study relied exclusively on scrA overexpression, and the effect of an scrA mutant was not investigated. In this study, we sought to identify the specific toxins responsible for the previously identified increase in hemolytic activity and decreased membrane stability (25). Additionally, we have characterized an scrA mutant and demonstrated that the loss of ScrA leads to defects in aggregation in the presence of human serum and a reduction in dissemination to the heart in a murine model of systemic infection. Collectively, these results build on those of our previous study and demonstrate that ScrA contributes to S. aureus pathogenesis in vivo.

RESULTS

ScrA influences cellular aggregation differentially in the presence of host factors.

Our previous work demonstrated that ScrA overexpression led to increased cellular aggregation in statically incubated, planktonically grown cultures (25). However, previous work also demonstrated that the expression level of scrA (previously named tsr37 or SAUSA300s301) is ~16-fold lower in cells grown in human serum than in those grown in tryptic soy broth (TSB) (26). The relative abundance of large and small S. aureus surface adhesins has been shown to control intercellular aggregation and host factor-mediated clumping (27). Since ScrA appears to modulate SaeRS activity (25), and scrA expression is influenced by human serum (26), we hypothesized that the abundance of ScrA within a cell would influence binding to host factors by altering the relative abundance of surface proteins. To investigate if ScrA influences binding to host factors, we performed a modified clumping assay. We have observed that ScrA-induced aggregates can be readily dispersed by agitation, so to minimize cellular aggregation, we performed a clumping assay while rotating the samples (see Fig. S1A in the supplemental material). After 60 min of rotating incubation, samples were incubated statically for 5 min, allowing aggregates to settle to the bottom of the tubes. Samples rotated in this assay in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) demonstrated an increase in cellular aggregation when ScrA was overexpressed (similar to our previous findings), while no difference was observed between the wild type (WT) and the scrA mutant (Fig. 1A). Interestingly, when cells were rotated in human serum, the opposite trend was observed, with the ScrA-overexpressing strain showing a decrease in clumping relative to the empty vector controls. Furthermore, the scrA mutant demonstrated a slight (but significant) increase in clumping relative to both the ScrA-overexpressing strain and the WT (Fig. 1A).

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Rotating (A) and static (B) clumping assays of ScrA-overexpressing and scrA mutant strains in PBS and human serum. (A) Cultures were incubated with rotation in 600 mL whole human serum for 30 min. After incubation statically at room temperature for 5 min to allow clumps to settle, the OD600 of the top 100 mL was determined. (B) Rotating cultures were resuspended by pipetting and vortexing to disperse aggregates and incubated statically at room temperature for 40 min. The OD600 of the top 100 mL was determined. The reduction in the OD600 from that of the initial culture is indicative of clumping. Statistical significance was determined by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). *, P < 0.5; ****, P < 0.001.

Next, the samples described above were resuspended by vortexing (to break up previously formed clumps), the top 100 μL was removed, and the optical density at 600 nm (OD600) was determined. The cultures were then incubated statically at room temperature for 40 min, the top 100 μL was removed, and the OD600 was measured. The difference in the OD600 values before and after the 40-min incubation was expressed as percent clumping (Fig. 1B). The results for the PBS samples were consistent with those with rotating incubation (Fig. 1A); however, unlike the samples in the original assay (Fig. 1A), the ScrA overexpression strain in serum now showed no significant decrease in aggregation compared to the WT. These phenotypes are likely due to changes in proteins involved in intracellular binding as opposed to proteins involved in host factor binding in the overexpression strain. It is known that larger surface adhesins may interfere with host factor and intercellular binding (27). Likely, the deletion of scrA leads to the decreased expression of large surface proteins, which allows more efficient binding to host factors. This reduction in large surface proteins would reduce interference and allow host factors to move within the binding range of the smaller adhesins residing closer to the cell. This raises the question of which host factors are being bound, and which larger S. aureus surface proteins are absent when scrA is deleted.

ScrA influences host factor binding and surface protein expression.

To investigate if host factor binding was being altered by the presence of scrA, we performed a cell wall “shaving” assay on cells incubated in either PBS or human serum. Bacterial cells were incubated with either PBS or human serum while rotating before being washed. Surface proteins (and any associated host proteins) were then removed by incubating cells with immobilized trypsin, after which cells were pelleted and the supernatant was collected. The supernatants, containing extracted protein fragments, were analyzed by mass spectrometry (MS).

The mass spectrometry results were grouped into 3 categories, S. aureus proteins identified from samples where S. aureus was incubated in PBS (Fig. 2A and D and Data Set S1), S. aureus proteins identified from samples where S. aureus was incubated in human serum (Fig. 2B and E and Data Set S2), and human proteins identified from samples where S. aureus was incubated in serum (Fig. 2C and F and Data Set S3). Within the S. aureus proteins identified from samples incubated in PBS (Fig. 2A), several proteins were identified only in ScrAB-overexpressing strains. Of note, several of the 107 unique proteins found in the ScrAB overexpression strain in PBS (Fig. 2D) are predicted cytoplasmic proteins. Previous work from our group showed that ScrAB overexpression leads to decreased membrane stability (25), which likely accounts for the large number of cytoplasmic proteins identified in these samples. This would explain the decreased number of S. aureus proteins detected in the wild-type and scrA mutant strains incubated in PBS. Only 1 protein (nuclease) was uniquely identified in the wild-type strain, and only 1 protein (SAUSA300_2097) was uniquely identified in the scrA mutant strain (Fig. 2D). Of the 107 proteins uniquely identified in the ScrAB-overexpressing strain, 7 of the top 10 most abundant proteins are predicted cytoplasmic proteins (Table 1 and Data Set S1).

FIG 2.

FIG 2

S. aureus and human proteins identified by cell wall shaving assays. Bacterial cells were incubated in either PBS or whole human serum. (A and D) S. aureus proteins identified from cells incubated in PBS. (B and E) S. aureus proteins identified from cells incubated in serum. (C and F) Human proteins identified from cells incubated in PBS. Heat maps (A to C) represent proteins identified in the indicated strains, and the data shown are the averages from triplicate samples. Venn diagrams (D to F) indicate the number of proteins uniquely identified in each strain, the number of proteins found in two out of three strains, and the number of proteins found in all three strains.

TABLE 1.

S. aureus proteins uniquely identified in samples incubated in PBS

Gene product Function
Unique in the WT
 Nuc Secreted nuclease
Unique in the ScrA overexpressor (10 most abundant)
 Emp Surface adhesin
 LukS Toxin
 FnbA Surface adhesin
 Ear Secreted protein Ear
 RpsB Ribosome component
 TarJ Ribitol-5-phosphate dehydrogenase
 RplF Ribosome component
 RplV Ribosome component
 PyrC Dihydro-orotase
 SelX Enterotoxin-like toxin X
Unique in the scrA mutant
 SAUSA300_2097 Hypothetical protein

S. aureus proteins identified from samples incubated in human serum (Fig. 2B) showed a trend that was overall similar to that of samples incubated in PBS (Fig. 2A); i.e., more proteins were uniquely identified from samples of the ScrAB-overexpressing strain. In total, 12 proteins were uniquely identified in wild-type samples, 58 proteins were uniquely identified in the ScrAB-overexpressing samples, and 0 unique proteins were identified from the scrA mutant (Fig. 2E). Interestingly, only 33 total proteins were identified in scrA mutant samples. This could be explained by the increased clumping observed in the scrA mutant incubated in human serum (Fig. 1B), which may prevent trypsin from accessing surface proteins. Once again, several predicted cytoplasmic proteins were uniquely identified in both the wild-type and ScrAB-overexpressing samples (Table 2 and Data Set S2).

TABLE 2.

S. aureus proteins uniquely identified in samples incubated in serum

Gene product Function
Unique in the WT
 SAUSA300_0555 Metabolism
 SAUSA300_0307 Metabolism
 SAUSA300_0173 Hypothetical protein
 RpsP Ribosomal component
 RplO Ribosomal component
 SAUSA300_1582 Hypothetical protein
 RpsO Ribosomal component
 SAUSA300_1685 Hypothetical protein
 SAUSA300_1491 Metabolism
 SAUSA300_1698 Hypothetical protein
 Mqo Metabolism
 FloA Hypothetical protein
Unique in the ScrA overexpressor (10 most abundant)
 Coa Adhesin
 FnbA Surface adhesin
 Emp Surface adhesin
 RpsM Ribosomal component
 RplK Ribosomal component
 Ear Hypothetical protein
 Hpf Ribosomal component
 FruA Metabolism
 LukF Toxin
 RplB Ribosomal component

Finally, we looked at human proteins bound by S. aureus cells incubated in human serum. Overall, there were few differences in human proteins bound by S. aureus cells (Fig. 2C), with the wild-type, ScrA overexpressor, and scrA mutant strains having 4, 5, and 3 unique proteins, respectively (Fig. 2F, Table 3, and Data Set S3). The unique proteins from the wild-type strain were all identified as human immunoglobulin components, while the unique proteins from the ScrA-overexpressing strain included extracellular matrix and cell structure proteins. This is unsurprising as the extracellular matrix binding protein Emp was one of the unique proteins identified from ScrA-overexpressing samples incubated in PBS and human serum (Tables 1 and 2). Unfortunately, none of the 3 unique proteins identified in the scrA mutant strain could explain the increased clumping observed in this strain, with 2 proteins being immunoglobulin components and 1 being a sulfhydryl oxidase (Table 3). Interestingly, 2 coagulation factors, X and XIII, were identified in the wild-type and overexpressing strains but not in samples of the scrA mutant.

FIG 3.

FIG 3

ScrA-induced hemolysis is dependent on S. aureus gamma-hemolysin. (A) ScrA overexpression in an αPSM mutant results in an increase in hemolysis over the empty vector control. (B) ScrA overexpression in an hlgA mutant does not lead to an increase in hemolytic activity. Statistical significance was determined using a one way ANOVA with Tukeys multiple comparison. *, P < 0.5; ***, P < 0.005; ****, P < 0.001.

TABLE 3.

Human proteins uniquely identified in samples incubated in serum

Gene product Function
Unique in the WT
 IGKV1D-8 Immunoglobulin component
 IGHV3OR15-7 Immunoglobulin component
 IGHV1-2 Immunoglobulin component
 IGHV4-4 Immunoglobulin component
Unique in the ScrA overexpressor
 ECM1 Extracellular matrix protein
 DSG1 Desmoglein 1
 CD14 Pattern recognition receptor
 FLNA Cell structure protein
 TLN1 Cell structural protein
Unique in the scrA mutant
 IGHV3-23 Immunoglobulin component
 IGHV2-26 Immunoglobulin component
 QSOX1 Sulfhydryl oxidase
Common to the WT and the ScrA overexpressor
 IGHD Immunoglobulin component
 F13A1 Coagulation factor XIII
 IGLV2-18 Immunoglobulin component
 IGLV9-49 Immunoglobulin component
 F10 Coagulation factor X
 ADIPOQ Adiponectin

When comparing the relative abundances of proteins, we identified some notable differences. In the scrA mutant incubated in PBS, the level of the hypothetical protein SAUSA300_0602 was increased 1.85-fold over that of the wild type and 10.03-fold over that of the ScrAB overexpression strain (Table 4 and Data Set S1). The level of ClfA was increased 4.25-fold over that of the ScrAB overexpressor, while both FnbA and Efb were not present in the scrA mutant (Table 4). This increase in ClfA may result in increased binding to von Willebrand factor (vWf), as it has been shown previously that von Willebrand binding factor produced by S. aureus facilitates ClfA and vWf binding (28). In human serum, we observed a 6.25-fold increase in vWf bound by the scrA mutant compared to the wild type (Table 4 and Data Set S2). However, the ScrAB-overexpressing strain demonstrated a 47-fold increase in bound von Willebrand factor over that of the wild type and a 7.64-fold increase in bound von Willebrand factor over that of the scrA mutant (Table 4). This is unsurprising as ScrAB overexpression was previously shown to increase the expression of von Willebrand binding factor (25). Additionally, several host proteins bound by the scrA mutant, including coagulation factor XIII, extracellular matrix proteins, and filamin A, showed either an insignificant change compared to wild type or a significant decrease compared to the ScrAB overexpressor (Table 4 and Data Set S3). Interestingly, fibrinogen bound by the scrA mutant was increased 1.66-fold compared to the wild type and 1.92-fold compared to the ScrAB overexpressor (Table 4). This increase in fibrinogen binding occurs despite an apparent decrease in Efb, with the scrA mutant expressing a 2.85-fold-lower level than the wild type and a 10.59-fold-lower level than the ScrAB overexpressor. This apparent discrepancy may again be due to the clumping observed in the scrA mutant. Increased binding to host factors may result in the decreased efficacy of cell wall shaving by trypsin through blocking access to proteins. Another possible explanation is the activity of polysaccharide intracellular adhesin (PIA), which would not be determined by the mass spectrometry experiment.

TABLE 4.

Select proteins showing statistically significant differential abundances by proteomic analysisa

Gene product or function Organism Fold change
pScrAB/EV scrA/EV scrA/pScrAB
PBS
 SAUSA300_0602 S. aureus NS 1.85 10.03
 ClfA S. aureus NS NS 4.25
 FnbA S. aureus NS −∞
 Efb S. aureus 1.41 −∞ −∞
Serum
 Fibrinogen Human NS 1.66 1.92
 von Willebrand factor Human 47.74 6.25 −7.64
 Coagulation factor XIII Human 26.18 NS −∞
 Extracellular matrix protein Human NS −∞
 Filamin A Human NS −∞
 Efb S. aureus 3.72 −2.85 −10.59
a

∞, not identified in the denominator sample; −∞, not identified in the numerator sample; EV, empty vector; NS, not significant. Fold change values are only displayed for proteins demonstrating statistically significant differences. Significance was determined by Students t-test.

No single protein appears to be responsible for the clumping observed in the scrA mutant. Therefore, it is likely that, rather than a single factor, the observed clumping is due to the dysregulation of several surface proteins and potential activity by nonprotein adhesion mechanisms such as PIA.

ScrA-induced hemolysis is mediated by HlgAB.

The overexpression of ScrA was previously shown to increase the hemolytic activity of S. aureus culture supernatants (25); however, we did not previously investigate the specific toxin(s) responsible for this increase. Previous work by us and others (2932) demonstrated that the phenol-soluble modulins (PSMs) are potent at lysing human erythrocytes. To investigate if PSMs were responsible for the observed increase in hemolysis, we performed an erythrocyte hemolysis assay using cell-free culture supernatants from WT S. aureus and an αPSM mutant strain containing either the ScrA overexpression plasmid or an empty vector control. As previously demonstrated, the overexpression of ScrA leads to the increased hemolysis of WT S. aureus (Fig. 3A). Overall, the hemolysis levels were reduced in the αPSM mutant compared to the wild type; however, there was still a significant increase in hemolysis when ScrA was overexpressed in the αPSM mutant (Fig. 3A). This result suggests that while the αPSMs contribute to erythrocyte hemolysis, another toxin is responsible for the increase observed upon ScrA overexpression.

Proteomics analysis of the secreted fraction of an ScrA-overexpressing strain showed an increased abundance of gamma-hemolysin components (25). It was previously shown that the bivalent toxin HlgAB also has cytolytic activity toward human erythrocytes (15, 33). To determine if ScrA overexpression leads to increased hemolysis through Hlg overproduction, we performed a hemolysis assay by overexpressing ScrA in an hlgA mutant background and comparing the results to those for the empty vector controls. Once again, in the WT strain, the overexpression of ScrA led to increased hemolysis; however, when ScrA was overexpressed in an hlgA mutant, no increase in hemolytic activity was observed (Fig. 3B). This result strongly suggests that HlgA is mediating the ScrA-dependent increase in hemolytic activity.

ScrA-mediated hemolytic activity requires the SaeRS system.

While we previously established that ScrA-mediated cellular aggregation was dependent on the SaeRS system, we also wanted to determine if this requirement extended to the increase in hemolysis. To investigate this, we overexpressed ScrA in an saeR mutant strain and quantified the hemolytic activity. Surprisingly, we observed a decrease in the hemolytic activity when ScrA was overexpressed in an saeR mutant, compared to the empty vector control (Fig. 4A). To investigate if the decrease in hemolysis observed in the saeR mutant was due to aberrant SaeS activity, we next overexpressed ScrA in an saeS mutant. A similar reduction in hemolytic activity was observed following the overexpression of ScrA in the saeS mutant background (Fig. 4B). This suggests that in addition to activating the Sae system, there may be an additional unidentified target/role for ScrA.

FIG 4.

FIG 4

ScrA overexpression leads to reduced hemolysis in an Sae mutant. (A) ScrAB overexpression leads to a decrease in hemolytic activity in an saeR mutant. No change in hemolytic activity is observed upon ScrA overexpression in an agrA mutant. (B) Overexpression of ScrA in either an saeR or an saeS mutant background leads to decreased hemolytic activity. *, P < 0.5; ***, P < 0.005; ****, P < 0.001.

ScrA-mediated hemolysis requires the Agr system.

In addition to investigating the role of the Sae system in ScrA-mediated hemolysis, we investigated if the quorum-sensing Agr system is required for the ScrA-mediated increase in hemolytic activity. It is well established that the Agr system influences the expression of hemolysin genes and is also known to regulate sae transcription (8, 34, 35). As such, it constitutes a potential alternative target for ScrA. The overexpression of ScrA in an agrA mutant resulted in no increase in hemolytic activity (Fig. 4A), suggesting that ScrA-induced hemolysin production requires a functional Agr system. However, it remains unclear if this is due to a direct interaction between ScrA and Agr or is indirect, possibly due to Agr activity on the Sae system.

ScrA is not essential for hemolysis.

While we have demonstrated that the overexpression of ScrA leads to increased hemolytic activity via Hlg, we have yet to determine if ScrA is essential for hemolysis. To investigate this, we performed a cell-free hemolysis assay using the wild-type and scrA mutant strains. We observed no significant change in hemolytic activity between the wild type and the scrA mutant (Fig. 5), suggesting that while ScrA overexpression can cause an increase in hemolytic activity, it is not required for hemolysis in the wild-type background.

FIG 5.

FIG 5

ScrA is not required for hemolysis in S. aureus. A hemolysis assay was performed using wild-type S. aureus and an scrA mutant strain. No significant difference in hemolysis was observed in the mutant strain.

ScrA stabilizes the S. aureus membrane potentially by regulating lipase activity.

A decrease in membrane stability was previously observed when ScrA was overexpressed, and the instability was shown to be dependent on the presence of SaeRS (25). We hypothesized this was due to a downstream effect mediated by a member of the SaeRS regulon. To further investigate this phenotype, we first determined if the opposite effect occurred in an scrA mutant strain. To do so, we once again employed a propidium iodide staining assay. Propidium iodide is unable to pass intact membranes, and therefore, an increase in staining indicates membrane instability and penetration of the dye into the cell. The results demonstrated a slight increase in membrane stability in the scrA mutant strain (Fig. 6A). Membrane stability was decreased following the overexpression of ScrA (25).

FIG 6.

FIG 6

Membrane stability and lipase activity are similarly impacted by ScrA. Membrane stability (A) and lipase activity (B) were determined in ScrA-overexpressing and scrA mutant strains. (A) ScrA-overexpressing strains show increased membrane instability, while an scrA mutant shows increased membrane stability. (B) Lipase activity mirrors membrane stability, with the ScrA-overexpressing strain demonstrating increased lipase activity and the scrA mutant demonstrating a modest, although nonsignificant (P = 0.0542), decrease in lipase activity. *, P < 0.5; ****, P < 0.001.

Potential mediators of this membrane instability are staphylococcal lipases, which are influenced by SaeRS (4). Some lipases, such as S. aureus lipase 3 (SAL3), have been shown to bind to phosphatidylglycerol, which is abundant in the S. aureus membrane (36). A change in the lipase abundance may be sufficient to influence S. aureus membrane stability. To investigate if there is a difference in lipase activity, we utilized the QuantiChrom lipase activity kit, used in previous studies of S. aureus lipases (36). We observed a significant increase in lipase activity in the ScrA overexpression strain (Fig. 6B), consistent with the increase in propidium iodide staining/membrane instability. Similarly, a reduction in lipase activity was observed in the scrA mutant, which mirrored the trend observed in the propidium iodide staining assay (although the reduction in lipase activity was deemed nonsignificant [P = 0.0542]). Due to the consistency between the results of the lipase activity and membrane stability assays, we consider it likely that an altered lipase abundance affects membrane stability; however, these results are correlative at this point and do not establish a direct link between altered lipase activity and membrane stability.

ScrA is required for full virulence in a murine model of systemic infection.

While we were able to identify several virulence-related phenotypes following scrA inactivation or overexpression in vitro, it remained unclear if these would culminate in a biologically relevant change in virulence in vivo. Therefore, to investigate this, we performed a murine model of systemic dissemination of infection using wild-type and scrA mutant strains of S. aureus. Groups of 12 mice were inoculated, and after 3 days, the bacterial burdens in the brain, heart, lungs, liver, kidneys, and spleen were determined. Compared to mice infected with the wild-type strain, scrA mutant-infected mice had decreased bacterial burdens in the heart, lungs, and liver (Fig. 7), while there was no significant difference in the brain, kidneys, or spleen. It is worth noting that the decrease in the bacterial burden in the heart is ~2 logs higher than the reduction observed in the lungs or liver, with mean differences of −3.11 × 106 (heart), −1.14 × 104 (lungs), and −1.01 × 104 (liver). This striking difference for the scrA mutant in the heart is suggestive of an organ-specific role for ScrA during infections. Overall, these data show that scrA is required for the full virulence of S. aureus.

FIG 7.

FIG 7

Murine model of systemic infection. Mice were infected with either the WT or the scrA mutant strain. Infection progressed for 3 days before euthanasia and organ harvest. The bacterial burdens in the brain, heart, lungs, liver, kidneys, and spleen were determined. Significant decreases in the bacterial burdens in the heart, lungs, and liver were observed, with the heart showing the largest decrease in the bacterial burden. Significance was determined using a Mann-Whitney test. *, P < 0.5; ***, P < 0.005.

DISCUSSION

The regulation of S. aureus virulence is a complex process requiring strict control by both RNA and protein systems. Two-component systems represent one part of this regulatory network and are canonically thought of as environmental sensors. Accessory proteins that modulate the activity of these two-component systems are well established in S. aureus (3, 19, 24, 37). We previously identified the small protein ScrA as a potential regulator of the SaeRS system; however, our initial investigation relied exclusively on the overexpression of ScrA, which resulted in a variety of pronounced phenotypes (25). In this study, we show that the phenotypes in an scrA mutant strain are typically inverse to those of an ScrA overexpressor and, in general, are more subtle. The subtlety of these phenotypes, in addition to the relatively low basal levels of scrA expression, suggests that ScrA may be expressed and required only in a specific niche. Murine infection models corroborate this hypothesis due to the marked decrease in the bacterial burden observed in mice infected with the scrA mutant, particularly in the heart. Previously, we have shown that von Willebrand binding factor is >100-fold more abundant in the secretome when ScrA is overexpressed (25). Additionally, in this study, we observed a 47-fold increase in bound von Willebrand factor (Table 4). It has been established that S. aureus binding to von Willebrand factor allows adherence to endothelial tissue and resistance to sheer forces, which are essential for the early stages of endocarditis (38, 39). It is conceivable that in the absence of ScrA, S. aureus cells have a reduced ability to adhere to the heart, which results in a reduction in the bacterial burden.

However, the array of environments experienced by the bacterium during in vivo infection makes it difficult to know the precise conditions that stimulate scrA expression. It is tempting to speculate that ScrA may play a role in neutrophil interactions as many of the conditions encountered during interactions with neutrophils, such as human neutrophil peptide 1, H2O2, and decreased pH, are known to stimulate SaeS (2, 9, 17, 40, 41). It is possible that under normal conditions, ScrA expression would reduce the fitness of the cell, which may explain the strict regulatory control over scrA. As it stands, however, more study is needed to determine the exact environment and signals that stimulate scrA expression.

Cellular aggregation is a well-established immune evasion strategy used by bacteria to prevent phagocytosis (42). However, release from these aggregates is equally important, and for S. aureus, this is mediated by proteins such as staphylokinase and the binding of plasminogen (4244). Additionally, release from biofilms during the exodus phase, mediated by proteases and nucleases, is required for the dissemination of the bacteria to distal sites (45). For optimal fitness, S. aureus must balance clumping and dispersal. ScrA may act at low levels to modulate the activity of SaeS to maintain an equilibrium in this binding-and-release model. This hypothesis is extended to include the regulation of lipases, which are correlated with membrane stability in our study (Fig. 6). Bacterial membranes represent a complex fluid mosaic that is in a constant state of change, and the presence of microdomains appears to play an essential role in bacteria (4648). The previously reported protein SAL3 has been shown to have a binding affinity for lipids found within the S. aureus membrane (36). Our data suggest that in addition to the dysregulation of adhesins, alterations in the ScrA abundance also lead to dysregulated lipase expression/activity, which, when paired with the observed membrane stability changes, leads us to hypothesize a role for ScrA in regulating membrane stability through lipase activity.

Previous work by our laboratory had demonstrated that ScrA-mediated cellular aggregation and membrane instability required the presence of a functional SaeRS system. This strongly suggested a direct interaction between ScrA and some component of the Sae system. However, in this study, we have observed an Sae-independent decrease in hemolytic activity following the overexpression of ScrA (Fig. 3C). While a connection between ScrA and the Sae systems still appears likely, this result raises the question of whether ScrA has an additional target (other than Sae) or if the observed increase in Sae activity is a downstream effect of an interaction between ScrA and an as-yet-unidentified protein. Further studies to identify potential interaction partners for ScrA are ongoing in our laboratory and will likely reveal the mechanism behind this regulation.

The results outlined in this study demonstrate that ScrA is a vital component of the S. aureus regulatory network and is required for full virulence in a murine model of infection. We have shown that the abundance of ScrA alters host factor binding and surface protein expression. Additionally, ScrA-mediated hemolysis was shown to be mediated by HlgAB, which is known to be a member of the SaeRS regulon. However, the requirement for Agr and the decrease in hemolysis in the absence of SaeR or SaeS suggest an additional role for ScrA aside from Sae regulation. It is possible that this is due to ScrA activity on an intermediary, which in turn impacts Sae, in addition to as-yet-unidentified targets. However, a possible intermediary has yet to be identified. Regardless, this is suggestive of ScrA acting in a larger regulatory network as opposed to our original model as a direct activator of Sae. In all, this suggests ScrA may play a larger role in S. aureus virulence than originally anticipated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Strains and strain construction.

All bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 5. All oligonucleotides are listed in Table 6. Transposon mutants were acquired from the Network on Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus (NARSA) (49) and transduced into USA300 AH1263. Phage transduction of both transposon mutations and plasmids was performed using bacteriophage Φ11. The presence of a transposon in scrA was confirmed by PCR using primer pair 0669/0831. The presence of pMK4 was confirmed by PCR using primer pair 0045/0046.

TABLE 5.

Strains used in this study

Strain or plasmid Characteristic Reference
S. aureus strains
 AH1263 USA300 LAC isolate cured of plasmid LAC-p03 58
 RKC0684 AH1263 saeR::Bursa 25
 RKC0742 AH1263 scrA::Bursa This study
 RKC0599 AH1263/pMK4 59
 RKC0760 AH1263/pRKC752 25
 RKC0763 AH1263 scrA::Bursa/pMK4_EV This study
 RKC0878 AH1263 saeR::Bursa/pScrAB 25
 RKC0908 AH1263 saeR::Bursa/pMK4_EV 25
 RKC1066 AH1263 saeS::Bursa/pScrAB 25
 RKC1067 AH1263 saeS::Bursa/pMK4_EV 25
 RKC0772 AH1263 agrA::Ery/pRKC752 25
 RKC0694 AH1263 agrA::Ery 25
Plasmids
 pMK4 Gram-positive shuttle vector (Cmr) 60
 pRKC752 pMK4_scrAB (vector overexpressing scrAB from its native promoter) 25
 pRKC1033 pCN51_scrA (vector overexpressing scrA from a cadmium-inducible promoter) 25

TABLE 6.

Primers used in this study

Primer Sequence Description
0045 GTAAAACGACGGCCAGTG M13 forward primer
0046 GGAAACAGCTATGACCATG M13 reverse primer
0669 AAAACTGCAGAAAATTAATGCGATGATTTTTAGC scrA forward primer
0831 CggatccCCTGATAGAATATAATGTACTGTC scrA reverse primer

Bacterial growth conditions.

S. aureus cultures were routinely grown at 37°C with shaking in tryptic soy broth (TSB). Escherichia coli cultures were grown at 37°C with shaking in lysogeny broth (LB). Where indicated, the following antibiotics were used at the indicated concentrations: chloramphenicol (10 μg/mL), erythromycin (5 μg/mL), lincomycin (25 μg/mL), and ampicillin (100 μg/mL).

Rotating and static aggregation assays.

Cultures grown overnight were diluted to an OD600 of 1, and 1 mL was transferred to a 1.7-mL microcentrifuge tube. Cells were pelleted and washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Cells were resuspended in 600 μL of either PBS or whole human serum. Cells were incubated at 37°C with rotation for 30 min. Cells were incubated statically at room temperature for 5 min to allow aggregates to settle. The top 100 μL of the culture was removed to a 96-well plate. The cells were resuspended thoroughly by vortexing and then pipetting, and 100 μL was transferred to a 96-well plate. Resuspended cells were incubated at room temperature statically for 40 min. The top 100 μL of the culture was removed to a 96-well plate. The OD600 after each incubation was compared to the OD600 of the resuspended cells to calculate the percent reduction in the OD600.

Cell wall shaving.

Cell wall shaving was performed as previously described (50, 51). In short, cultures of S. aureus grown overnight were diluted to an OD600 of 1, and 1 mL of the culture was resuspended in 500 μL of either PBS or human serum and incubated with rotation at 37°C for 30 min. Suspensions were washed three times with PBS supplemented with 500 μL of 40% sucrose and 20 mM sodium azide. Cells were incubated with immobilized trypsin (catalog number 20230; Thermo Fisher) and suspended in PBS supplemented with 500 μL of 40% sucrose and 20 mM sodium azide at 37°C for 2 h. Cells were pelleted, and the supernatant containing protein fragments was analyzed by mass spectrometry to determine proteins.

Cell-free human erythrocyte lysis assay.

Hemolysis assays were performed as previously described (25). In short, cultures grown overnight were diluted 1:100 and grown in 25 mL in a 250-mL flask overnight. Cells were pelleted, and the supernatants were filter sterilized. Two hundred microliters of the supernatant was diluted 1:2 with hemolysis buffer (40 mM CaCl2 and 1.7% NaCl). Fifty microliters of whole human blood was added to each tube, and the samples were incubated with rotation at 37°C for 10 min. Intact cells were pelleted at 5,000 × g for 1 min. One hundred microliters of the supernatant was transferred to a 96-well plate, and the OD543 was determined.

Propidium iodide staining.

Propidium iodide staining was performed as previously described (25). In short, cultures were grown in 5 mL TSB in a 15-mL conical tube overnight. Cultures were diluted to an OD600 of 1 and resuspended in PBS. One milliliter of the cells was transferred to a microcentrifuge tube. One hundred microliters was transferred to a white 96-well plate. Propidium iodide was added to the remaining 900 μL, and the samples were allowed to incubate for 5 min at room temperature. One hundred microliters of the stained culture was transferred to a white opaque 96-well plate, and the fluorescence was measured. The fluorescence from the unstained culture was subtracted from the total fluorescence.

Lipase activity.

The lipase activity assay was modified from a method described previously by Kumar et al. (36). In short, the QuantiChrom lipase assay kit (BioAssay Systems) was used to determine lipase activity according to the manufacturer’s directions. Cultures grown overnight were pelleted, and the supernatant was diluted 1:10 in TSB. Ten microliters of the diluted supernatant was transferred to 96-well plates. The working solution was prepared according to the manufacturer’s instructions and heated to 37°C prior to use. A 140-μL working solution was added to each sample. The OD412 was determined at 20 min and 30 min, and the increase in the OD412 over this time was used to calculate lipase activity according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Mass spectrometry.

Protein concentrations were determined using the 660 protein assay (Pierce). Equal concentrations of protein (200 μg) were processed for liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) using s-traps (Protifi) (52, 53). Briefly, proteins were reduced with dithiothreitol (DTT), alkylated with iodoacetamide (IAA), acidified using phosphoric acid, and combined with s-trap loading buffer (90% methanol [MeOH], 100 mM triethylammonium bicarbonate (TEAB)). Proteins were loaded onto s-traps, washed, and finally digested with trypsin–Lys-C (Promega) (1:100 [wt/wt] enzyme/protein) overnight at 37°C. Peptides were eluted and dried with a vacuum concentrator. Peptides were resuspended in H2O–1% acetonitrile (ACN)–0.1% formic acid for LC-MS/MS analysis.

Peptides were separated using a 75-μm by 50-cm C18 reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) column (Thermo Scientific) on an Ultimate 3000 ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) system (Thermo Scientific) with a 120-min gradient (2 to 32% ACN with 0.1% formic acid) and analyzed on a hybrid quadrupole-Orbitrap instrument (Q Exactive Plus; Thermo Fisher Scientific). Full MS survey scans were acquired at a resolution of 70,000. The top 10 most abundant ions were selected for MS/MS analysis.

Raw data files were processed in MaxQuant (v2.1.4) (https://www.maxquant.org) and searched against the current UniProt S. aureus protein sequence database with the addition of the ScrA protein sequence. Search parameters included the constant modification of cysteine by carbamidomethylation and the variable modifications of methionine oxidation and protein N-terminal acetylation. Proteins were identified using the filtering criterion of a 1% protein and peptide false discovery rate. The protein intensity values were normalized using the MaxQuant LFQ (label-free quantitation) function (54).

Label-free quantitation analysis was performed using Perseus software (v1.6.14.0), developed for the analysis of omics data (55). LFQ intensity values were log2 transformed and then filtered to include proteins containing at least 60% valid values (reported LFQ intensities) in at least one experimental group. Finally, the missing values in the filtered data set were replaced using the imputation function in Perseus with default parameters (55). Statistical analyses were carried out using the filtered and imputed protein group files. Statistically significant changes in protein abundances were determined using Welch’s t test P values and z-scores.

Murine infections.

A murine model of systemic infection was performed as previously described (56). In short, cultures grown overnight were diluted 1:100 in 10 mL TSB and grown to an OD600 of 0.7. Bacteria were resuspended in sterile PBS to a final concentration of 107 CFU/100 μL. Mice were injected retro-orbitally with 100 μL of the bacterial suspension. Infections were allowed to progress for 3 days. Mice were euthanized; the brain, heart, lungs, liver, kidneys, and spleen were harvested; and the organ mass was recorded. Organs were homogenized, serially diluted, and normalized to the organ weight to determine the bacterial burden.

Ethics statement.

Human blood was obtained according to procedures approved by the Ohio University Institutional Review Board. Blood was obtained from anonymous donors at Ohio University. Animal experiments were performed under the approval of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (reference protocol identifier 17-H-019).

Data availability.

The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE (57) partner repository with the data set identifier PXD038927.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We acknowledge Dale Chaput and the University of South Florida Proteomics Core for their assistance with mass spectrometry procedures and data analysis.

Footnotes

Supplemental material is available online only.

Supplemental file 1
File S1. Download spectrum.05255-22-s0001.xlsx, XLSX file, 0.2 MB (246.5KB, xlsx)
Supplemental file 2
File S2. Download spectrum.05255-22-s0002.xlsx, XLSX file, 0.2 MB (244.5KB, xlsx)
Supplemental file 3
File S3. Download spectrum.05255-22-s0003.xlsx, XLSX file, 0.2 MB (245.9KB, xlsx)
Supplemental file 4
Fig. S1 and legends of Files S1 to S3. Download spectrum.05255-22-s0004.pdf, PDF file, 4.2 MB (4.2MB, pdf)

Contributor Information

Ronan K. Carroll, Email: carrolr3@ohio.edu.

Mariola J. Ferraro, University of Florida

REFERENCES

  • 1.Tong SYC, Davis JS, Eichenberger E, Holland TL, Fowler VG, Jr. 2015. Staphylococcus aureus infections: epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and management. Clin Microbiol Rev 28:603–661. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00134-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Liu Q, Yeo W, Bae T. 2016. The SaeRS two-component system of Staphylococcus aureus. Genes (Basel) 7:81. doi: 10.3390/genes7100081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bleul L, Francois P, Wolz C. 2021. Two-component systems of S. aureus: signaling and sensing mechanisms. Genes (Basel) 13:34. doi: 10.3390/genes13010034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rogasch K, Rühmling V, Pané-Farré J, Höper D, Weinberg C, Fuchs S, Schmudde M, Bröker BM, Wolz C, Hecker M, Engelmann S. 2006. Influence of the two-component system SaeRS on global gene expression in two different Staphylococcus aureus strains. J Bacteriol 188:7742–7758. doi: 10.1128/JB.00555-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tiwari N, López-Redondo M, Miguel-Romero L, Kulhankova K, Cahill MP, Tran PM, Kinney KJ, Kilgore SH, Al-Tameemi H, Herfst CA, Tuffs SW, Kirby JR, Boyd JM, McCormick JK, Salgado-Pabón W, Marina A, Schlievert PM, Fuentes EJ. 2020. The SrrAB two-component system regulates Staphylococcus aureus pathogenicity through redox sensitive cysteines. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 117:10989–10999. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1921307117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Haag AF, Bagnoli F. 2017. The role of two-component signal transduction systems in Staphylococcus aureus virulence regulation. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 409:145–198. doi: 10.1007/82_2015_5019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Münzenmayer L, Geiger T, Daiber E, Schulte B, Autenrieth SE, Fraunholz M, Wolz C. 2016. Influence of Sae-regulated and Agr-regulated factors on the escape of Staphylococcus aureus from human macrophages. Cell Microbiol 18:1172–1183. doi: 10.1111/cmi.12577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Matsumoto M, Nakagawa S, Zhang L, Nakamura Y, Villaruz AE, Otto M, Wolz C, Inohara N, Núñez G. 2021. Interaction between Staphylococcus Agr virulence and neutrophils regulates pathogen expansion in the skin. Cell Host Microbe 29:930–940.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2021.03.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Flack CE, Zurek OW, Meishery DD, Pallister KB, Malone CL, Horswill AR, Voyich JM. 2014. Differential regulation of staphylococcal virulence by the sensor kinase SaeS in response to neutrophil-derived stimuli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:E2037–E2045. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1322125111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Giraudo AT, Cheung AL, Nagel R. 1997. The sae locus of Staphylococcus aureus controls exoprotein synthesis at the transcriptional level. Arch Microbiol 168:53–58. doi: 10.1007/s002030050469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yamazaki K, Kato F, Kamio Y, Kaneko J. 2006. Expression of γ-hemolysin regulated by sae in Staphylococcus aureus strain Smith 5R. FEMS Microbiol Lett 259:174–180. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00236.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Crosby HA, Tiwari N, Kwiecinski JM, Xu Z, Dykstra A, Jenul C, Fuentes EJ, Horswill AR. 2020. The Staphylococcus aureus ArlRS two-component system regulates virulence factor expression through MgrA. Mol Microbiol 113:103–122. doi: 10.1111/mmi.14404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kwiecinski JM, Crosby HA, Valotteau C, Hippensteel JA, Nayak MK, Chauhan AK, Schmidt EP, Dufrêne YF, Horswill AR. 2019. Staphylococcus aureus adhesion in endovascular infections is controlled by the ArlRS-MgrA signaling cascade. PLoS Pathog 15:e1007800. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mainiero M, Goerke C, Geiger T, Gonser C, Herbert S, Wolz C. 2010. Differential target gene activation by the Staphylococcus aureus two-component system saeRS. J Bacteriol 192:613–623. doi: 10.1128/JB.01242-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Venkatasubramaniam A, Kanipakala T, Ganjbaksh N, Mehr R, Mukherjee I, Krishnan S, Bae T, Aman MJ, Adhikari RP. 2018. A critical role for HlgA in Staphylococcus aureus pathogenesis revealed by a switch in the SaeRS two-component regulatory system. Toxins (Basel) 10:377. doi: 10.3390/toxins10090377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Steinhuber A, Goerke C, Bayer MG, Döring G, Wolz C. 2003. Molecular architecture of the regulatory locus sae of Staphylococcus aureus and its impact on expression of virulence factors. J Bacteriol 185:6278–6286. doi: 10.1128/JB.185.21.6278-6286.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Geiger T, Goerke C, Mainiero M, Kraus D, Wolz C. 2008. The virulence regulator Sae of Staphylococcus aureus: promoter activities and response to phagocytosis-related signals. J Bacteriol 190:3419–3428. doi: 10.1128/JB.01927-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Liang X, Yu C, Sun J, Liu H, Landwehr C, Holmes D, Ji Y. 2006. Inactivation of a two-component signal transduction system, SaeRS, eliminates adherence and attenuates virulence of Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Immun 74:4655–4665. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00322-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Collins MM, Behera RK, Pallister KB, Evans TJ, Burroughs O, Flack C, Guerra FE, Pullman W, Cone B, Dankoff JG, Nygaard TK, Brinsmade SR, Voyich JM. 2020. The accessory gene saeP of the SaeR/S two-component gene regulatory system impacts Staphylococcus aureus virulence during neutrophil interaction. Front Microbiol 11:561. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Li D, Cheung A. 2008. Repression of hla by rot is dependent on sae in Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Immun 76:1068–1075. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01069-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gudeta DD, Lei MG, Lee CY. 2019. Contribution of hla regulation by SaeR to Staphylococcus aureus USA300 pathogenesis. Infect Immun 87:e00231-19. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00231-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mascher T. 2006. Intramembrane-sensing histidine kinases: a new family of cell envelope stress sensors in Firmicutes bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Lett 264:133–144. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00444.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mascher T. 2014. Bacterial (intramembrane-sensing) histidine kinases: signal transfer rather than stimulus perception. Trends Microbiol 22:559–565. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2014.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Jeong D-W, Cho H, Jones MB, Shatzkes K, Sun F, Ji Q, Liu Q, Peterson SN, He C, Bae T. 2012. The auxiliary protein complex SaePQ activates the phosphatase activity of sensor kinase SaeS in the SaeRS two-component system of Staphylococcus aureus. Mol Microbiol 86:331–348. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08198.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wittekind MA, Frey A, Bonsall AE, Briaud P, Keogh RA, Wiemels RE, Shaw LN, Carroll RK. 2022. The novel protein ScrA acts through the SaeRS two-component system to regulate virulence gene expression in Staphylococcus aureus. Mol Microbiol 117:1196–1212. doi: 10.1111/mmi.14901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Carroll RK, Weiss A, Broach WH, Wiemels RE, Mogen AB, Rice KC, Shaw N. 2016. Genome-wide annotation, identification, and global transcriptomic analysis of regulatory or small RNA gene expression in Staphylococcus aureus. mBio 7:e01990-15. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01990-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Crosby HA, Schlievert PM, Merriman JA, King JM, Salgado-Pabón W, Horswill AR. 2016. The Staphylococcus aureus global regulator MgrA modulates clumping and virulence by controlling surface protein expression. PLoS Pathog 12:e1005604. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Viljoen A, Viela F, Mathelié-Guinlet M, Missiakas D, Pietrocola G, Speziale P, Dufrêne YF. 2021. Staphylococcus aureus vWF-binding protein triggers a strong interaction between clumping factor A and host vWF. Commun Biol 4:453. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-01986-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Peschel A, Otto M. 2013. Phenol-soluble modulins and staphylococcal infection. Nat Rev Microbiol 11:667–673. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Cheung GYC, Joo H-S, Chatterjee SS, Otto M. 2014. Phenol-soluble modulins—critical determinants of staphylococcal virulence. FEMS Microbiol Rev 38:698–719. doi: 10.1111/1574-6976.12057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Björnsdottir H, Dahlstrand Rudin A, Klose FP, Elmwall J, Welin A, Stylianou M, Christenson K, Urban CF, Forsman H, Dahlgren C, Karlsson A, Bylund J. 2017. Phenol-soluble modulin α peptide toxins from aggressive Staphylococcus aureus induce rapid formation of neutrophil extracellular traps through a reactive oxygen species-independent pathway. Front Immunol 8:257. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Laabei M, Jamieson WD, Yang Y, van den Elsen J, Jenkins ATA. 2014. Investigating the lytic activity and structural properties of Staphylococcus aureus phenol soluble modulin (PSM) peptide toxins. Biochim Biophys Acta 1838:3153–3161. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2014.08.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kamio Y, Rahman A, Nariya H, Ozawa T, Izaki K. 1993. The two staphylococcal bi-component toxins, leukocidin and gamma-hemolysin, share one component in common. FEBS Lett 321:15–18. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(93)80611-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sloan TJ, Murray E, Yokoyama M, Massey RC, Chan WC, Bonev BB, Williams P. 2019. Timing is everything: impact of naturally occurring Staphylococcus aureus AgrC cytoplasmic domain adaptive mutations on autoinduction. J Bacteriol 201:e00409-19. doi: 10.1128/JB.00409-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Novick RP, Jiang D. 2003. The staphylococcal saeRS system coordinates environmental signals with agr quorum sensing. Microbiology (Reading) 149:2709–2717. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.26575-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kumar NG, Contaifer D, Wijesinghe DS, Jefferson KK. 2021. Staphylococcus aureus lipase 3 (SAL3) is a surface-associated lipase that hydrolyzes short chain fatty acids. PLoS One 16:e0258106. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zhao L, Xue T, Shang F, Sun H, Sun B. 2010. Staphylococcus aureus AI-2 quorum sensing associates with the KdpDE two-component system to regulate capsular polysaccharide synthesis and virulence. Infect Immun 78:3506–3515. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00131-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Claes J, Liesenborghs L, Peetermans M, Veloso TR, Missiakas D, Schneewind O, Mancini S, Entenza JM, Hoylaerts MF, Heying R, Verhamme P, Vanassche T. 2017. Clumping factor A, von Willebrand factor-binding protein and von Willebrand factor anchor Staphylococcus aureus to the vessel wall. J Thromb Haemost 15:1009–1019. doi: 10.1111/jth.13653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Liesenborghs L, Meyers S, Lox M, Criel M, Claes J, Peetermans M, Trenson S, Vande Velde G, Vanden Berghe P, Baatsen P, Missiakas D, Schneewind O, Peetermans WE, Hoylaerts MF, Vanassche T, Verhamme P. 2019. Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis: distinct mechanisms of bacterial adhesion to damaged and inflamed heart valves. Eur Heart J 40:3248–3259. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Schäfer D, Lâm T-T, Geiger T, Mainiero M, Engelmann S, Hussain M, Bosserhoff A, Frosch M, Bischoff M, Wolz C, Reidl J, Sinha B. 2009. A point mutation in the sensor histidine kinase saeS of Staphylococcus aureus strain Newman alters the response to biocide exposure. J Bacteriol 191:7306–7314. doi: 10.1128/JB.00630-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Liu Q, Cho H, Yeo W-S, Bae T. 2015. The extracytoplasmic linker peptide of the sensor protein SaeS tunes the kinase activity required for staphylococcal virulence in response to host signals. PLoS Pathog 11:e1004799. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Crosby HA, Kwiecinski J, Horswill AR. 2016. Staphylococcus aureus aggregation and coagulation mechanisms, and their function in host-pathogen interactions. Adv Appl Microbiol 96:1–41. doi: 10.1016/bs.aambs.2016.07.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Bokarewa MI, Jin T, Tarkowski A. 2006. Staphylococcus aureus: staphylokinase. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 38:504–509. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2005.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Mölkänen T, Tyynelä J, Helin J, Kalkkinen N, Kuusela P. 2002. Enhanced activation of bound plasminogen on Staphylococcus aureus by staphylokinase. FEBS Lett 517:72–78. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(02)02580-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Moormeier DE, Bose JL, Horswill AR, Bayles KW. 2014. Temporal and stochastic control of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm development. mBio 5:e01341-14. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01341-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.López D, Kolter R. 2010. Functional microdomains in bacterial membranes. Genes Dev 24:1893–1902. doi: 10.1101/gad.1945010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Farnoud AM, Toledo AM, Konopka JB, Del Poeta M, London E. 2015. Raft-like membrane domains in pathogenic microorganisms. Curr Top Membr 75:233–268. doi: 10.1016/bs.ctm.2015.03.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.García-Fernández E, Koch G, Wagner RM, Fekete A, Stengel ST, Schneider J, Mielich-Süss B, Geibel S, Markert SM, Stigloher C, Lopez D. 2017. Membrane microdomain disassembly inhibits MRSA antibiotic resistance. Cell 171:1354–1367.e20. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.10.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Fey PD, Endres JL, Yajjala VK, Widhelm TJ, Boissy RJ, Bose JL, Bayles KW. 2013. A genetic resource for rapid and comprehensive phenotype screening of nonessential Staphylococcus aureus genes. mBio 4:e00537-12. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00537-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Dreisbach A, Hempel K, Buist G, Hecker M, Becher D, van Dijl JM. 2010. Profiling the surfacome of Staphylococcus aureus. Proteomics 10:3082–3096. doi: 10.1002/pmic.201000062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Dreisbach A, Wang M, van der Kooi-Pol MM, Reilman E, Koedijk DGAM, Mars RAT, Duipmans J, Jonkman M, Benschop JJ, Bonarius HPJ, Groen H, Hecker M, Otto A, Bäsell K, Bernhardt J, Back JW, Becher D, Buist G, van Dijl JM. 2020. Tryptic shaving of Staphylococcus aureus unveils immunodominant epitopes on the bacterial cell surface. J Proteome Res 19:2997–3010. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.HaileMariam M, Eguez RV, Singh H, Bekele S, Ameni G, Pieper R, Yu Y. 2018. S-Trap, an ultrafast sample-preparation approach for shotgun proteomics. J Proteome Res 17:2917–2924. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Zougman A, Selby PJ, Banks RE. 2014. Suspension trapping (STrap) sample preparation method for bottom-up proteomics analysis. Proteomics 14:1006–1010. doi: 10.1002/pmic.201300553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Cox J, Hein MY, Luber CA, Paron I, Nagaraj N, Mann M. 2014. Accurate proteome-wide label-free quantification by delayed normalization and maximal peptide ratio extraction, termed MaxLFQ. Mol Cell Proteomics 13:2513–2526. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M113.031591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Tyanova S, Temu T, Sinitcyn P, Carlson A, Hein MY, Geiger T, Mann M, Cox J. 2016. The Perseus computational platform for comprehensive analysis of (prote)omics data. Nat Methods 13:731–740. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Keogh RA, Zapf RL, Trzeciak E, Null GG, Wiemels RE, Carroll RK. 2019. Novel regulation of alpha-toxin and the phenol-soluble modulins by peptidyl-prolyl cis/trans isomerase enzymes in Staphylococcus aureus. Toxins (Basel) 11:343. doi: 10.3390/toxins11060343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Perez-Riverol Y, Bai J, Bandla C, García-Seisdedos D, Hewapathirana S, Kamatchinathan S, Kundu DJ, Prakash A, Frericks-Zipper A, Eisenacher M, Walzer M, Wang S, Brazma A, Vizcaíno JA. 2022. The PRIDE database resources in 2022: a hub for mass spectrometry-based proteomics evidences. Nucleic Acids Res 50:D543–D552. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab1038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Boles BR, Thoendel M, Roth AJ, Horswill AR. 2010. Identification of genes involved in polysaccharide-independent Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation. PLoS One 5:e10146. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Zapf RL, Wiemels RE, Keogh RA, Holzschu DL, Howell KM, Trzeciak E, Caillet AR, King KA, Selhorst SA, Naldrett MJ, Bose JL, Carroll RK. 2019. The small RNA Teg41 regulates expression of the alpha phenol-soluble modulins and is required for virulence in Staphylococcus aureus. mBio 10:e02484-18. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02484-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Sullivan MA, Yasbin RE, Young FE. 1984. New shuttle vectors for Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli which allow rapid detection of inserted fragments. Gene 29:21–26. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(84)90161-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental file 1

File S1. Download spectrum.05255-22-s0001.xlsx, XLSX file, 0.2 MB (246.5KB, xlsx)

Supplemental file 2

File S2. Download spectrum.05255-22-s0002.xlsx, XLSX file, 0.2 MB (244.5KB, xlsx)

Supplemental file 3

File S3. Download spectrum.05255-22-s0003.xlsx, XLSX file, 0.2 MB (245.9KB, xlsx)

Supplemental file 4

Fig. S1 and legends of Files S1 to S3. Download spectrum.05255-22-s0004.pdf, PDF file, 4.2 MB (4.2MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE (57) partner repository with the data set identifier PXD038927.


Articles from Microbiology Spectrum are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES