Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jun 15.
Published in final edited form as: Atmos Meas Tech. 2023 Jan 13;16(1):169–179. doi: 10.5194/amt-16-169-2023

Table 3.

Comparison of the median RMSE (μg/m3) for PM2.5 from 1-week calibration periods with different coverages of temperature and RH conditions. Only calibration periods with more than 50% coverage of the PM2.5 concentration range were included in the table (>50% corresponds to 26 μg/m3 or more in this dataset). For four scenarios (e.g., PM2.5 coverage > 50%, RH Coverage > 50%, T Coverage > 20%), the 1st percentile RMSE, 99th percentile RMSE, and the percentage of calibrations that exhibited all required conditions (e.g., RH > X % and T > X%) are shown (1st - 99th percentile; %). For comparison, the median (1st - 99th percentile) of the PM2.5 1-week calibration periods from the full data set (i.e., no coverage requirements) was 6.6 μg/m3 (3.1 – 18.3 μg/m3).

PM2 5 RMSE from 1-week calibrations with > 50% concentration coverage Increasing Temperature Data Coverage ---->
T range > Δ10°C (Coverage >~20%) T range > Δ15°C (Coverage >~30%) T range > Δ20°C (Coverage >~40%) T range > Δ25°C (Coverage >~50%) T range > Δ30°C (Coverage >~60%)
Increasing RH Data Coverage <---- RH range > Δ40% (Coverage >~50%) 4.7 (3.2 – 17.2; 21%) 4.7 4.7 4.4 3.8 (3.3 – 11.5; 2%)
RH range > Δ48% (Coverage >~60%) 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.4 3.7
RH range > Δ56% (Coverage >~70%) 4.3 4.3 4.4 4.3 3.7
RH range > Δ64% (Coverage >~80%) 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.1 3.7
RH range > Δ72% (Coverage >~90%) 4.2 (3.2 – 6.8; 7%) 4.2 4.3 3.9 3.6 (3.2 – 3.7; 1%)