Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jun 15.
Published in final edited form as: Appl Sci (Basel). 2023 Apr 28;13(9):5496. doi: 10.3390/app13095496

Table 1.

Speech evaluations and results by malocclusion type.

Author, Year, and Language Sample Size, DFD Groups and Ages Methods Used Preoperative Findings Timepoints Evaluated Postoperative Findings
DFD Group: Class III
Ahn et al., 2015 [52]
Language: Korean
N = 16
Class III n = 8
Controls* n = 8
Ages 18–26
Formant analysis of vowels Class III DFD patients used an area of the formant graph 133.44% larger than the controls. Presurgery, 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months postsurgery F1 and F2 formants of Class III patients reduced in vowels [a], [i], [e], and [æ] by 6 months postsurgery; articulating positions shifted.
Bruce and Hanson, 1987 [53]
Language: English
N = 4
Class III n = 3
Asymmetry n = 1
No controls
Ages 16–43
Perceptual evaluation of recordings; tongue thrust evaluation 100% of DFD patients presented with a lisp and tongue thrust. Distortions were seen in [s] and [z] sounds. Presurgery, 9 weeks postsurgery Correction of speech in 50% of patients, 25% of those with tongue thrust improved.
Ghaemi et al., 2021 [54]
Language: Persian
N = 20
Class III n = 20
No controls
Ages 18–40
Perceptual evaluation of recordings; formant analysis of vowels 95% of Class III DFD patients produced distortions in consonant sounds [ʃ] and [s]. Distortions were also present in [ɹ] and [z] sounds in the majority of participants. Presurgery, 1 and 6 months postsurgery All articulation errors eliminated by 6 months postoperatively; speech intelligibility increased to 100% at 6 months postsurgery.
Glass et al., 1977 [55]
Language: English
N = 5
Class III n = 5
No controls
Ages 18–54
Perceptual evaluation of recordings All Class III DFD patients had speech articulation distortions. Presurgery, 2 months postsurgery Decrease in sibilant distortions in 100% of patients.
Goodstein et al., 1974 [56]
Language: English
N = 10
Class III n = 5
Controls n = 5
Ages: N/A
Perceptual evaluation of recordings 100% of Class III DFD patients had preoperative speech errors. Presurgery, splint removal, 2 months postsurgery More fluent speech postoperatively, but no significant changes in speech pattern in 100% of Class III patients.
Guay et al., 1978 [57]
Language: English
N = 12
Class III n = 12
No controls
Mean age: 13
Live perceptual evaluation; cephalometric analysis 92% of Class III patients had some degree of distortion of [s]. Tongue posture at rest was lower than normal. Presurgery NA: Postoperative outcomes were not studied.
Lathrop-Marshall et al., 2022 [26]
Language: English
N = 164
Class III n = 102
Controls n = 62
Ages 14–40
Perceptual evaluation of recordings; cephalometric analysis; spectral moment analysis Severity of malocclusion correlated with distortion of [t] and [tʃ] in Class III patients. Presurgery NA: Postoperative outcomes were not studied.
Weimer and Astrand, 1977 [58]
Language: Swedish
N = 30
Class III n = 30
No controls
Ages 18–45
Perceptual evaluation of recordings Mild speech defects were seen in 17% of Class III DFD patients preoperatively; 83% of the patients were considered to have normal speech. Presurgery, 6 months postsurgery 60% of patients with preoperative speech defects had correction in speech, 40% of those patients experienced slight improvement in speech.
DFD Group: Class II
Garber et al., 1981 [59]
Language: English
N = 6
Class II n = 6
No controls
Ages 14–24
Perceptual evaluation of recordings; cephalometric analysis Average of 35 errors in speech were noted during the presurgical recordings among Class II DFD patients. Presurgery, 5 days; 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postsurgery Speech deterioration was noted immediately after surgery, predominantly in phoneme [s]; there was overall improvement long-term after surgery.
Niemi et al., 2006 [60]
Language: Finnish
N = 5
Class II n = 5
No controls
Ages 31–42
Formant analysis of vowels; cephalometric analysis None of the subjects had speech disorders or difficulties despite having DFD. Presurgery, 6 and 30 weeks postsurgery No significant long-lasting changes were found postoperatively.
DFD Group: Anterior Open Bite (AOB)
Keyser et al., 2022 [19]
Language: English
N = 101
AOB n = 39
Controls n = 62
Ages 14–40
Perceptual evaluation of recordings; spectral moment analysis; cephalometric analysis Higher prevalence of distorted [s] found in AOB patients. Presurgery NA: Postoperative outcomes were not studied.
Knez Amrožič et al., 2015 [21]
Language: Slovenian
N = 15
AOB n = 15
No controls
Ages 18–32
Formant analysis of vowels; cephalometric analysis 60% of AOB DFD patients had articulation disorders. Presurgery, 6 months postsurgery No significant changes were found postoperatively.
Kravanja et al., 2018 [61]
Language: Slovenian
N = 75
AOB n = 32
Controls n = 43
Ages 3–7
Live perceptual evaluation; ultrasound imaging of tongue 84% of AOB patients had articulation disorders and 81% of AOB patients had abnormal tongue posture. Presurgery NA: Postoperative outcomes were not studied.
Turvey et al., 1976 [62]
Language: English
N = 9
Class III/AOB n = 2
Class II/AOB n = 4
Class I/AOB n = 3
No controls
Ages 14–27
Live perceptual evaluation; cephalometric analysis; tongue thrust evaluation 89% of DFD patients presented with perceptible lisping preoperatively. Presurgery, 3-, 6- and 12-months postsurgery 78% had improvement in lisping; all patients improved in tongue function.
DFD Group: Multiple Malocclusions
Bowers et al., 1985 [63]
Language: English
N = 5
Class III n = 2
Class II n = 3
No controls
Ages 17–22
Perceptual evaluation of recordings; formant analysis of vowels All patients had perceptually normal speech preoperatively. Preorthodontic treatment, presurgery, postsurgery, postdebonding Significant frequency shift for [e]; speech was perceptually normal postoperatively.
Buyuknacar et al., 1993 [50]
Language: Turkish
N = 60
Class III n = 20
Class II n = 20
Controls n = 20
Mean age: 14
Spectral moment analysis; cephalometric analysis Center of gravity for [s] was lower in Class II patients compared with others. No evidence for correlation between malocclusion and speech disorder. Presurgery NA: Postoperative outcomes were not studied.
Dalston and Vig, 1984 [64]
Language: English
N = 40
Class III n = 25
Class II n = 15
No controls
Ages N/A (adults)
Perceptual evaluation of recordings; velopharyngeal evaluation; cephalometric analysis More than half of the errors were made by 20% of all patients. Most of the errors were distortions of [s] and [z]. Presurgery, 6 and 12 months postsurgery Nasal–oral coupling and nasal resistance significantly improved; no significant perceptual changes in speech postoperatively.
Geffen, 1978 [65]
Languages: English and Afrikaans
N = 9
Class III n = 6
Class II n = 2
Asymmetry n = 1
No controls
Ages N/A (adults)
Perceptual evaluation of recordings; cephalometric analysis 67% of Class III DFD patients had distortions of [s]. All Class II and asymmetric patients had distortions of the [s] sound. Presurgery, 3–11 months postsurgery 22% had improvement in articulation of [s] phoneme; 55% had improvement in general quality of speech; articulating positions shifted.
Laine, 1992 [66]
Language: Finnish
N = 451**
Class III n = 25
Class II n = 70
AOB n = 40
Controls n = 90
Other n = 226
Mean age: 23
Perceptual evaluation of recordings 53% of Class III, Class II and AOB patients had speech disorders; most common disorders being those produced anterior to the correct location of articulation. Presurgery NA: Postoperative outcomes were not studied.
Leavy et al., 2016 [20]
Language: English
N = 115
Class III n = 8
Class II n = 47
AOB n = 31
Controls n = 60
Ages 8–36
Perceptual evaluation of recordings 62% of all subjects (with or without malocclusions) had articulatory distortions, mainly of [s] and [t] sounds; more severe malocclusion, more likely to have a speech distortion. Presurgery NA: Postoperative outcomes were not studied.
Lichnowska et al., 2021 [67]
Language: Polish
N = 37
Class III n = 28
Class II n = 9
No controls
Ages 18–50
Perceptual evaluation of recordings; tongue thrust evaluation 100% of patients presented with articulation concerns (by inclusions criteria); distortions in Class III patients were worse than in Class II. Presurgery NA: Postoperative outcomes were not studied.
Oliver et al., 2022 [44]
Language: English
N = 227
Class III n = 102
Class II n = 53
Controls n = 72
Ages 12–37
Perceptual evaluation of recordings; spectral moment analysis Greater occurrence of distortions among Class II DFD patients compared with controls; lower consonant spectral moments for Class II compared with Class III and AOB DFD patients. Presurgery NA: Postoperative outcomes were not studied.
Ruscello, 1986 [68]
Language: English
N = 20
Class III n = 11
Class II n = 3
Asymmetry n = 2
Maxillary Excess n = 4
No controls
Ages 17–53
Perceptual evaluation of recordings About 60% of all DFD patients exhibited preoperative articulation errors. Presurgery, splint removal, 3 and 6 months postsurgery 42% (of those with errors prior to surgery) showed reduction in errors postoperatively; 17% remained unchanged.
Vallino, 1990 [69]
Language: English
N = 34
Class III n = 11
Class III/AOB n = 5
Class II n = 23
Class II/AOB n = 12
No controls
Ages 14–48
Live perceptual evaluation; velopharyngeal evaluation 88% of all DFD patients showed articulation errors with distortions of sibilants [s] and [z] being the most commonly observed. Presurgery, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postsurgery 57% (of those with errors prior to surgery) experienced correction of speech; 43% improved; surgery did not impact velopharyngeal area.
Vallino et al., 1993 [48]
Language: English
N = 33
Class III n = 6
Class III/AOB n = 4
Class II n = 12
Class II/AOB n = 11
No controls
Ages 14–39
Live perceptual evaluation; cephalometric analysis 88% of all patients had articulatory distortions; most of them associated with sibilant sounds [s] and [z]. Presurgery NA: Postoperative outcomes were not studied.
Wakumoto et al., 1996 [70]
Language: Japanese
N = 5
Class III n = 3
Class II n = 2
No controls
Ages 17–31
Electropalatography; spectral peak analysis None of the patients had preoperative speech disorders when judged by an SLP. Preorthodontic treatment, presurgery, 3 and 6 months postsurgery Articulating positions shifted for 100% of patients; significant acoustic changes in 40% of patients.
Ward et al., 2002 [71]
Language: English
N = 13
Class III n = 1
Class III/AOB n = 1
Class II n = 3
Controls n = 8
Ages 15–21
Perceptual evaluation of recordings; velopharyngeal evaluation 80% of Class III, Class III/AOB and Class II DFD patients had articulatory distortions of lingual alveolar and palatal sibilants. Presurgery, 6 months postsurgery 25% (of those with errors prior to surgery) improved in articulation; 60% had improved interlabial pressures.
Witzel et al., 1980 [72]
Language: English
N = 41
Class III n = 4
Class III/AOB n = 7
Class II n = 12
Class II/AOB n = 17
AOB n = 1
No controls
Ages 9–26
Live perceptual evaluation 54% of DFD patients showed articulation errors. All groups had distortions of sibilants (except the patient with apertognathia). Labiodental distortions were noted in Class III patients. Bilabial sound distortions were noted in Class II patients. Presurgery, 6 months postsurgery 64% (of those with errors prior to surgery) saw correction of speech; 36% of those saw improvement in speech.
*

Control = Class I, no AOB.

**

Occlusal classifications reported.