Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 8;19(1):83–92. doi: 10.1017/S1368980015000877

Table 3.

Relative importance of child background characteristics in explaining EDSF and EDD consumption, children aged 7–12 years, Dutch National Food Consumption Survey 2007–2010

EDSF events (number/d, n 860) Energy intake from EDSF (kJ/d, n 852) EDD consumption (ml/d, n 852) Energy intake from EDD (kJ/d, n 847)
β P value β P value β P value β P value
Age 0·08 0·03 0·17 <0·01
Sex
Boys (reference)
Girls
BMI
Underweight −0·10 <0·01
Normal weight (reference)
Overweight −0·05 0·16
Ethnicity
Native Dutch (reference)
Western immigrant
Non-Western immigrant
Household income
Low (reference)
Intermediate
High
Degree of urbanization
Low (reference)
Intermediate −0·07 0·05
High −0·11 <0·01
Educational level mother
Low (reference)
Intermediate 0·03 0·39 −0·04 0·36 −0·08 0·04
High −0·12 <0·01 −0·10 <0·01 −0·17 <0·01
Educational level father
Low (reference)
Intermediate
High
Employment of mother
Employed (reference)
Non-employed −0·09 0·01
Employment of father
Employed (reference)
Non-employed
Household size
2 −0·03 0·44 <0·01 0·99
3 0·07 0·07 0·09 0·03
4 0·08 0·05 0·09 0·02
≥5 (reference)
R 2 0·02 0·04 0·02 0·05

EDSF, energy-dense snack food; EDD, energy-dense drink.

Analyses were weighted for small deviations in sociodemographic characteristics, day of the week and season of data collection.