Skip to main content
. 2015 May 21;19(4):633–637. doi: 10.1017/S1368980015001408

Table 1.

Participant characteristics in a between-subjects laboratory study of dishware size and snack food intake

Small bowl condition (n 31) Large bowl condition (n 30)
Mean sd Mean sd Statistical difference P
Age (years) 29·4 9·6 33·1 9·9 t (59)=1·5 0·15
BMI (kg/m2) 23·8 4·0 25·1 4·5 t (57)=1·2 0·25
Baseline hunger (VAS) 52·2 23·6 52·8 20·7 t (59)=0·1 0·92
Gender (no. of females/males) 24/7 25/5 χ 2=0·4 0·56
Dietary restraint scale 2·3 0·6 2·4 0·6 t (59)=1·1 0·27
Dietary disinhibition scale 2·4 0·6 2·7 0·5 t (59)=0·2 0·84
Emotional eating scale 2·2 0·8 2·2 0·7 t (59)=0·4 0·73

VAS, visual analogue scale.

Values presented are means and standard deviations, unless otherwise stated. Baseline hunger is on a 0–100 mm scale (anchors: 1=‘not at all hungry’, 100=‘extremely hungry’). Dietary restraint, disinhibition and emotional eating are represented by a score from 1 to 4, with higher scores denoting higher dietary restraint, dietary disinhibition and emotional eating. Statistical difference between small and large bowl conditions is compared using a t test, except for gender (χ 2 test).