Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 3;19(16):3027–3038. doi: 10.1017/S1368980016001282

Table 2.

Baseline characteristics of participants (n 316) and non-responders (n 175) in the SLIMMER intervention*

Intervention group (n 155) Control group (n 161) Non-responders (n 175)
Mean or % sd Mean or % sd Mean sd
n (male/female) 81/74 80/81 87/87
Age (years) 60·7 6·4 61·0 6·5 60·9 7·0
Education (%),§
Low 54·0 51·0 52·0
Middle 26·0 21·0 27·0
High 20·0 28·0 21·0
Perceived health (%)||
Poor/fair 21·0 21·0 10·0
Good 68·0 70·0 74·0
Very good/excellent 11·0 9·0 16·0
Ethnicity (%)
Dutch 88·0 89·0
Western non-Dutch 9·0 8·0
Non-Western non-Dutch 3·0 3·0
Employment status (%)
No paid job 54·0 52·0
Part-time job (<32 h/week) 18·0 22·0
Full-time job (≥32 h/week) 28·0 26·0
Family history of diabetes (%)
No 32·0 42·0
First degree 49·0 45·0
Second degree 19·0 13·0
BMI (kg/m2) 30·4 4·7 30·0 4·8
Fasting insulin (pmol/l) 93·3 64·3 82·5 50·2
*

Data are mean and sd or %.

n 174 for non-responders.

n 155 for intervention group, n 160 for control group and n 96 for non-responders.

§

Education level was based on the highest level of education completed and divided in three categories: low (primary school or less, lower vocational education), middle (medium vocational education, high school) and high (higher vocational education, university).

||

n 115 for non-responders.

n 154 for intervention group and n 161 for control group.