Table 5.

Associations between process indicators (dose received and acceptability) and intervention effectiveness of the SLIMMER intervention (n 144)^*,^†

	∆ fasting insulin (pmol/l) T1–T0			∆ weight (kg) T1–T0			∆ DHD-index T1–T0			∆ vigorous activities (min/week) T1–T0
	β	se	P value	β	se	P value	β	se	P value	β	se	P value
Dietary consultations (number)	−3·36	2·38	0·159	−0·48	0·38	0·207	0·85	0·52	0·102	26·54	27·50	0·336
Sports lessons (number)	−0·23	0·13	0·072	−0·07	0·02	0·001	0·02	0·03	0·527	0·73	1·61	0·651
Participant acceptability (score 1–10)	−4·51	2·21	0·044	−1·40	0·36	0·000	0·60	0·53	0·257	32·60	28·68	0·258

∆, change; T1, end of the intervention; T0, baseline; DHD-index, Dutch Healthy Diet Index.

^*Associations are adjusted for baseline value, sex and recruitment phase.

^†There are zero to four missing values per analysis because of incomplete data.