Table 2.
Pearson correlation coefficients (r) with 95 % confidence intervals* between dietary pattern scores and daily intakes of selected macro- and micronutrients among 6298 women aged 50–69 years, Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Programme, 2008
| Dietary pattern | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ‘Prudent’ | ‘Western’ | ‘Continental’ | ||||
| Nutrient | r | 95 % CI | r | 95 % CI | r | 95 % CI |
| Energy (kJ/d) | 0·59 | 0·58, 0·61 | 0·54 | 0·52, 0·57 | 0·16 | 0·14, 0·19 |
| Alcohol (g/d) | 0·07 | 0·04, 0·10 | −0·28 | −0·30, −0·25 | 0·36 | 0·34, 0·39 |
| Alcohol (E%) | −0·06 | −0·09, −0·04 | −0·37 | −0·39, −0·35 | 0·31 | 0·29, 0·33 |
| Total fat (E%) | 0·06 | 0·03, 0·08 | 0·19 | 0·16, 0·22 | 0·30 | 0·28, 0·32 |
| Saturated fat (E%) | −0·24 | −0·26, −0·21 | 0·36 | 0·33, 0·38 | 0·22 | 0·19, 0·24 |
| Protein (E%) | 0·16 | 0·13, 0·18 | −0·17 | −0·19, −0·14 | −0·09 | −0·11, −0·06 |
| Carbohydrate (E%) | −0·13 | −0·16, −0·10 | 0·13 | 0·10, 0·16 | −0·36 | −0·38, −0·34 |
| Added sugar (E%) | −0·18 | −0·21, −0·16 | 0·30 | 0·28, 0·32 | −0·05 | −0·07, −0·02 |
| Fibre (E%) | 0·40 | 0·37, 0·42 | −0·30 | −0·32, −0·27 | −0·26 | −0·29, −0·24 |
| Vitamin D (µg/d) | 0·27 | 0·25, 0·30 | 0·06 | 0·03, 0·08 | −0·07 | −0·09, −0·04 |
| Vitamin B12 (µg/d) | 0·45 | 0·43, 0·48 | 0·30 | 0·27, 0·32 | −0·01 | −0·04, 0·01 |
| Ca (mg/d) | 0·32 | 0·30, 0·34 | 0·27 | 0·24, 0·29 | −0·14 | −0·17, −0·12 |
| Fe (mg/d) | 0·12 | 0·10, 0·15 | 0·02 | −0·004, 0·04 | 0·01 | −0·02, 0·03 |
| Mg (mg/d) | 0·74 | 0·72, 0·75 | 0·27 | 0·25, 0·30 | 0·01 | −0·02, 0·03 |
E%, percentage of energy intake.
*
Confidence intervals based on 1000 bootstrap samples.