Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 5;19(7):1184–1194. doi: 10.1017/S136898001500275X

Table 3.

Percentage of participants classified by the first administration of the parent-administered semi-quantitative FFQ (SFFQ1) into the same or opposite quartile of consumption as measured by the average of the 4 d estimated food records (FR) or the second administration of the SFFQ (SFFQ2). A total of fifty-three and forty-eight Danish children aged 3–9 years, from the Capital Region and the Regional Municipality of Bornholm, were included in analyses of SFFQ1 v. FR and SFFQ1 v. SFFQ2, respectively

SFFQ1 v. FR SFFQ1 v. SFFQ2
Same quartile (%) Opposite quartile (%) Same quartile (%) Opposite quartile (%)
Vegetables and vegetable products (g/d) 43 7 38 8
Coarse vegetables (g/d) 49 15 40 13
Fruit and fruit products (g/d) 47 11 54 8
Fish and fish products (g/d) 44 0 46 0
Canned fish (g/d) 41 6 54 8
Rye bread and oats, ‘whole grains’ (g/d) 36 4 69 0
Sweet drinks (g/d) 26 7 52 4
Candy and chocolate (g/d) 36 12 33 8
Energy (kJ/d) 36 26 56 0
Dietary fibre (g/d) 34 18 42 17
Protein energy percentage (%)§ 38 17 50 13
Fat energy percentage (%)§ 43 14 58 0
Carbohydrate energy percentage (%)§ 42 11 60 8
Sugar energy percentage (%)§ 38 18 48 8

Including rye bread and oats as a marker of whole grain intake.

Including all non-alcoholic drinks with natural or added sugars, not including drinks with artificial sweeteners.

§

Intakes of macronutrients expressed as a percentage of energy: (macronutrient absolute value × energy conversion factor) ×100.