Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar 30;15(12):2210–2219. doi: 10.1017/S1368980012000729

Table 3.

The most common phenotypes of the double burden of malnutrition and CMRF by sex among adults (n 310) aged 25–60 years, northern district of Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso, 2010

All (n 310) Women (n 161) Men (n 149)
% 95 % CI % 95 % CI % 95 % CI P*
Phenotype 1 (1 or 2 micronutrient deficiencies plus ≥1 CMRF other than overweight/obesity) 9·0 5·9, 12·1 12·4 7·4, 17·4 5·4 1·8, 11·6 0·030
Phenotype 2 (1 or 2 micronutrients deficiencies plus overweight/obesity and ≥1 CMRF) 5·2 2·8, 7·6 7·5 3·5, 12·5 2·7 0·1, 5·3 0·050
Phenotype 3 (Underweight plus ≥1 CMRF) 5·2 2·8, 7·6 4·3 1·2, 7·4 6·0 2·2, 9·8 0·500
Phenotype 4 (1 or 2 micronutrient deficiencies plus MetS) 2·6 0·9, 4·3 4·3 1·2, 7·4 0·7 −0·6, 2·0 0·092
Phenotype 5 (Underweight plus 1 micronutrient deficiency plus ≥1 CMRF) 1·6 0·3, 2·9 1·9 −0·2, 4·0 1·3 −0·5, 3·1 0·930
Total double burden of malnutrition 23·5 18·8, 28·2 30·4 23·3, 37·5 16·1 10·2, 22·0 0·008

CMRF, cardiometabolic risk factors; MetS, metabolic syndrome.

*Significance of the difference between women and men as determined by the χ 2 test.