Skip to main content
. 2012 Feb 21;16(1):164–170. doi: 10.1017/S136898001200050X

Table 3.

Multivariate regression models of the association of HFIAS and IDDS with MUAC among 902 people living with HIV, Gulu and Soroti districts, Uganda, August 2008–September 2009

1 2 3
MUAC (mm) MUAC (mm) Wasting‡
Variable† β t β t AOR t
HFIAS score −0·527* −2·41
IDDS 1·138* 2·01
HFIAS severity (1 = severe food insecurity, 0 = not severe food insecurity) −5·967** −2·94 1·820(*) 1·71
IDDS reference (0–4 food groups/d) 1·00
IDDS medium (5–8 good groups/d) 4·659(*) 1·80 0·938 −0·14
IDDS high (9–12 food groups/d) 8·807* 2·28 0·179 −1·49
Constant 223·100*** 23·97 222·037*** 25·19 0·410 −0·59
Observations (n) 891 891 891

HFIAS, Household Food Insecurity Access Scale; IDDS, Individual Dietary Diversity Score; MUAC, mid upper-arm circumference; β, standardized regression coefficient; t, robust t statistic; AOR, adjusted odds ratio.

(*) P < 0·10., *P < 0·05, **P < 0·01, ***P < 0·001

†The control variables included in the models were: age in years; sex; CD4 count (cells/μl); education; if the person is the head of the household or spouse of the household head; if the person is in a stable relationship; if the household lives in an internally displaced camp; household size; per capita total monthly household expenditures in tertiles; time to TASO (The AIDS Support Organization) clinic (min); distance to the nearest government hospital (km); distance to the nearest market (km); month and year of the interview; and a district dummy.

‡Wasting defined as MUAC <230 mm for males; <220 mm for females.