Table 5.
Model 1 | Model 2† | Model 3 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variables | B | 95 % CI | β | P | B | 95 % CI | β | P | B | 95 % CI | β | P |
Energy and dietary diversity | ||||||||||||
Energy‡,§ | 8·30 | 7·50, 9·10 | 0·68 | <0·001 | 7·95 | 7·15, 8·75 | 0·65 | <0·001 | ||||
MDDS|| | 0·77 | 0·31, 1·23 | 0·11 | 0·001 | 0·63 | 0·17, 1·10 | 0·09 | 0·008 | ||||
Women’s characteristics | ||||||||||||
Age‡ | 1·37 | 0·30, 2·44 | 0·12 | 0·012 | 0·59 | −0·17, 1·36 | 0·05 | 0·13 | ||||
BMI‡ | 0·59 | −0·68, 1·85 | 0·04 | 0·36 | −0·62 | −1·54, 0·29 | −0·04 | 0·18 | ||||
Years of schooling‡,¶ | 1·03 | 0·61, 1·46 | 0·26 | <0·001 | 0·46 | 0·15, 0·73 | 0·12 | 0·003 | ||||
Household characteristics | ||||||||||||
Housing | ||||||||||||
Rents | Referent | |||||||||||
Owns | 0·45 | 0·13, 0·78 | 0·12 | 0·007 | 0·35 | 0·11, 0·58 | 0·09 | 0·004 | ||||
Husband’s years of schoolingl§,¶ | 0·35 | −0·18, 0·89 | 0·07 | 0·19 | 0·08 | −0·31, 0·47 | 0·01 | 0·70 | ||||
Season | ||||||||||||
Monsoon | Referent | Referent | ||||||||||
Post-monsoon | −0·33 | −1·01, 0·35 | −0·04 | 0·34 | −0·26 | −0·74, 0·23 | −0·03 | 0·30 | ||||
Winter | 1·00 | 0·42, 1·56 | 0·15 | 0·001 | 0·78 | 0·37, 1·18 | 0·12 | <0·001 | ||||
Pre-monsoon | 0·34 | −0·60, 1·03 | 0·04 | 0·34 | 0·65 | 0·15, 1·15 | 0·08 | 0·01 | ||||
Adjusted R 2 | 0·51 | 0·14 | 0·56 | |||||||||
Observations | 465 | 459 | 458 |
MPA, mean probability of adequacy.
Square-root transformed.
Linear regression model with MPA as the dependent variable and the independent variables that remained significant at the P<0·20 level after initial testing. Variables which were tested but not found significant were infant’s age and sex, parity, women’s occupation and husband’s occupation.
Natural-log transformed.
Mean dietary diversity score.
Treated as continuous variable from 1 (no schooling) to 6 (higher education).