Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 8;18(15):2722–2728. doi: 10.1017/S1368980015000701

Table 3.

Accuracy of young children’s perceptions of foods’ fruit content based on food advertising elements (n 49)

Foods containing real fruit* Foods containing sham fruit*
Food advertising elements Mean sd Mean sd P
Neither fruit name nor fruit image§ 81a 34 42a 41 <0·0001
Fruit name but no fruit image 72b 41 42a 40 0·0017
Fruit image but no fruit name 89c 26 28b 32 <0·0001
Both fruit name and fruit image 90c 23 17c 30 <0·0001
All elements combined (total score) 83 21 33 27 <0·0001

a,b,cMean values within a column with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P<0·01) as determined by χ 2 test.

*

Real fruit foods were composed primarily of fruit or 100 % fruit juice (>90 % by weight); sham fruit foods contained no real fruit, but contain artificial fruit flavours. Possible score range=0 to 100; higher scores indicate greater accuracy with regard to whether fruit was used to make the product.

Probability of significant differences between real fruit and sham fruit foods as determined by two-sample unequal-variance t test.

Verbal reference included the word fruit(y), juice (juicy) or specific fruit name(s).

§

Advertisement included one or more images (i.e. drawings, photographs and/or video) of fruit.