Skip to main content
. 2014 May 8;18(3):453–463. doi: 10.1017/S1368980014000603

Table 3.

Any breast-feeding duration according to receipt of ‘optimum’ BFI Program protocols among low-income women (n 5886) enrolled prenatally in a peer counselling breast-feeding support programme, Michigan, USA, 2005–2011

<1 month 1–3 months 4–6 months 7–9 months >9 months
(n 1267) (n 1688) (n 862) (n 328) (n 1244) χ 2 P value
In-person contacts
Less than optimal 6·8 5·8 2·8 5·2 2·7
Optimal 80·6 74·2 69·4 67·7 56·9 <0·001
More than optimal 12·6 20·0 27·8 27·1 40·4
Phone contacts§
Less than optimal 17·1 43·3 67·1 83·8 75·2
Optimal 74·4 46·5 27·2 16·2 18·9 <0·001
More than optimal 8·5 10·3 7·8 0·0 5·9

BFI, Breastfeeding Initiative.

Data presented are percentages of women in each category.

Based on BFI Program guidelines for scheduled prenatal phone contacts and home visits, early postnatal hospital and home visits, and postnatal phone contacts.

In-person contacts include visits in the hospital after delivery and home visits. ‘Optimal’ is defined as 1–3 contacts regardless of time in programme.

§

The ‘optimal’ quantity of phone contacts is dependent on time in programme: <1 month=2–6 contacts; 1–3 months=4–8 contacts; 4–6 months=7–11 contacts; 7–9 months=10–14 contacts; >9 months=12–17 contacts.