Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep 19;16(2):202–211. doi: 10.1017/S1368980012004120

Table 3.

Family and school environmental predictors of breakfast consumption, soft drink consumption and total PA at age 16 years among Flemish children (n 727)

Dependent variable Independent variables β t P Adj R 2
Breakfast at age 16 years (d/week) Full model (F = 10·93) <0·001 0·067
Family environment
Sociocultural
Good student according to parent? 0·05 1·26 NS
BMI parent −0·07 −1·94 NS
Breakfast together 0·22 5·93 <0·001
School environment
Sociocultural
Good student according to teacher? 0·06 1·50 NS
Political
Homework −0·07 −1·89 NS
Soft drink consumption at age 16 years (d/week) Full model (F = 22·90) <0·001 0·182
Family environment
Physical
Availability at home 0·23 6·15 <0·001
Sociocultural
Good student according to parent? −0·04 −1·01 NS
Soft drink consumption parents 0·08 2·09 0·04
Political
Soft drink consumption parenting 1 0·04 1·06 NS
Soft drink consumption parenting 2 −0·10 −2·39 0·02
Soft drink consumption parenting 3 −0·20 −4·66 <0·001
School environment
Sociocultural
Good student according to teacher? −0·07 −1·80 NS
Total PA at age 16 years (min/d) Full model (F = 9·48) <0·001 0·098
Family environment
Sociocultural
PA attitude 0·11 2·63 0·009
PA encouragement 0·17 3·08 0·002
PA fun benefit −0·06 −1·42 NS
PA relaxing benefit 0·17 3·73 <0·001
PA logistic support −0·03 −0·47 NS
School environment
Physical
Activity in playtime 0·01 0·29 NS
Participation extra-curricular sports 0·07 1·61 NS
Political
Hours PE 0·01 0·29 NS

PA, physical activity; PE, physical education.