Table 2.
Meeting all criteria maximum score | Criteria compliance* | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline | Follow-up | Baseline | Follow-up | |||||||
Max. score† | n | % | n | % | Mean | sd | Mean | sd | P value‡ | |
Training criteria | 1 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 90 | 0·0 | 0·0 | 0·9 | 0·3 | N/A |
Eating environment criteria | 10 | 1 | 5 | 19§ | 95 | 7·2 | 1·4 | 9·5|| | 2·2 | 0·001 |
Policy criteria | 26 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 100 | 13·0 | 0·0 | 26·0 | 0·0 | N/A |
Menu criteria | 25 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 75 | 14·9|| | 1·9 | 24·2 | 2·5 | <0·001 |
Food safety criteria | 2 | 12 | 60 | 17 | 85 | 1·6 | 0·6 | 1·8 | 0·5 | 0·096 |
Total checklist score | 64 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 80 | 36·6 | 2·7 | 62·4 | 4·2 | <0·001 |
Criteria compliance was calculated by summing together the number of criteria items achieved (yes=1/no=0) for checklist sections and total.
Number of items per checklist criteria section.
Paired t test used to compare mean compliance at baseline and follow-up. N/A indicates t test cannot be computed because the standard error of the difference is 0.
n 19 as eating environment criteria assessment was not completed by one centre.
n 18 as menu assessment tool component was not completed by two centres.