Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 28;18(14):2679–2688. doi: 10.1017/S1368980014003231

Table 4.

Multivariable associations between sociodemographic and dietary variables and sugar-sweetened beverage tax perception among a nationally representative sub-sample (largest sample n 1996) from the Nutrinet-Santé cohort study, France, 2012: perception of the economic impact variables

Imposing a tax on sweetened beverages would increase prices and reduce purchasing power (n 1996) A tax on sweetened beverages would be unfair because poor people would still need to pay the same amount as the rich (n 1960) I support imposing a tax on sweetened beverages only if the prices of other foods and beverages (which are good for health) go down (n 1951)
Agree Neither Agree Neither Agree Neither
OR 95 % CI OR 95 % CI P OR 95 % CI OR 95 % CI P OR 95 % CI OR 95 % CI P
Sex
Women 1·00 Ref. 1·00 Ref. 1·00 Ref. 1·00 Ref. 1·00 Ref. 1·00 Ref.
Men 1·13 0·89, 1·42 0·73 0·54, 0·98 0·0032 0·84 0·68, 1·04 0·91 0·70, 1·18 0·28 0·63 0·48, 0·81 1·13 0·80, 1·60 <0·001
Age
18–25 years 1·31 0·58, 2·98 0·91 0·31, 2·69 0·88 0·45, 1·73 0·53 0·21, 1·35 1·46 0·54, 3·95 0·95 0·25, 3·55
26–65 years 1·00 Ref. 1·00 Ref. 1·00 Ref. 1·00 Ref. 1·00 Ref. 1·00 Ref.
46–65 years 1·27 0·94, 1·72 0·94 0·63, 1·41 1·32 1·00, 1·75 1·02 0·72, 1·43 0·81 0·57, 1·13 0·80 0·51, 1·25
>65 years 1·28 0·86, 1·90 1·52 0·93, 2·50 0·078 1·05 0·73, 1·50 1·14 0·75, 1·74 0·12 1·12 0·71, 1·79 1·21 0·67, 2·19 0·45
Level of education
No diploma and primary 0·69 0·41, 1·15 0·51 0·24, 1·09 1·94 1·11, 3·39 1·58 0·81, 3·09 0·65 0·38, 1·14 0·58 0·27, 1·28
Secondary 1·13 0·87, 1·46 1·22 0·88, 1·70 1·32 1·04, 1·66 1·27 0·96, 1·68 0·87 0·66, 1·16 0·81 0·56, 1·18
Post-secondary graduate 1·00 Ref. 1·00 Ref. 0·16 1·00 Ref. 1·00 Ref. 0·059 1·00 Ref. 1·00 Ref. 0·53
Income per household unit
<900 €/month 1·15 0·74, 1·78 1·19 0·67, 2·11 1·08 0·72, 1·62 0·91 0·55, 1·51 0·62 0·40, 0·95 0·80 0·43, 1·48
900–2700 €/month 1·00 Ref. 1·00 Ref. 1·00 Ref. 1·00 Ref. 1·00 Ref. 1·00 Ref.
>2700 €/month 0·71 0·53, 0·94 0·96 0·66, 1·39 0·68 0·52, 0·89 0·77 0·56, 1·06 0·72 0·52, 1·00 1·15 0·75, 1·75
Refuses to answer 1·12 0·73, 1·72 1·44 0·85, 2·45 0·12 0·64 0·44, 0·93 0·86 0·55, 1·33 0·034 0·77 0·48, 1·24 1·71 0·96, 3·05 0·0011
Household composition
No children 1·00 Ref. 1·00 Ref. 1·00 Ref. 1·00 Ref. 1·00 Ref. 1·00 Ref.
One or more children (aged 0–13 years) 0·99 0·70, 1·39 0·93 0·58, 1·47 1·26 0·92, 1·74 0·99 0·66, 1·47 0·65 0·45, 0·95 0·74 0·45, 1·22
One or more adolescents (aged 14–18 years) 0·57 0·34, 0·95 0·76 0·38, 1·53 0·91 0·54, 1·53 0·89 0·47, 1·70 1·01 0·55, 1·86 0·89 0·38, 2·10
Children of both age categories 0·94 0·48, 1·85 0·98 0·40, 2·41 0·55 0·86 0·48, 1·55 0·58 0·26, 1·30 0·55 0·77 0·38, 1·56 0·90 0·35, 2·32 0·48
Sweetened beverage consumption
Tertile 1 1·00 Ref. 1·00 Ref. 1·00 Ref. 1·00 Ref. 1·00 Ref. 1·00 Ref.
Tertile 2 1·16 0·88, 1·54 1·15 0·80, 1·65 0·91 0·70, 1·18 0·83 0·61, 1·14 1·15 0·84, 1·58 1·06 0·69, 1·62
Tertile 3 1·29 0·97, 1·71 1·08 0·75, 1·57 0·40 1·20 0·92, 1·57 1·09 0·79, 1·50 0·23 1·03 0·75, 1·41 1·10 0·73, 1·67 0·81
Artificially sweetened beverages
Non-consumer 1·00 Ref. 1·00 Ref. 1·00 Ref. 1·00 Ref. 1·00 Ref. 1·00 Ref.
Consumer 1·03 0·80, 1·33 0·92 0·66, 1·29 0·73 0·95 0·75, 1·20 0·96 0·72, 1·27 0·90 1·02 0·77, 1·36 1·02 0·70, 1·49 0·99

Ref., referent category.

Results from multivariable multinomial regression with all variables included in the model.