Table 5.
Having a tax on sweetened beverages would help improve population health (n 1995) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Agree | Neither | ||||
OR | 95 % CI | OR | 95 % CI | P | |
Sex | |||||
Women | 1·00 | Ref. | 1·00 | Ref. | |
Men | 1·10 | 0·89, 1·37 | 1·16 | 0·87, 1·54 | 0·557 |
Age | |||||
18–25 years | 0·89 | 0·45, 1·78 | 1·12 | 0·48, 2·59 | |
26–45 years | 1·00 | Ref. | 1·00 | Ref. | |
46–65 years | 1·31 | 1·00, 1·73 | 1·16 | 0·80, 1·67 | |
>65 years | 3·01 | 2·00, 4·52 | 1·63 | 0·96, 2·78 | <0·001 |
Level of education | |||||
No diploma and primary | 0·47 | 0·28, 0·78 | 0·79 | 0·41, 1·51 | |
Secondary | 0·71 | 0·56, 0·90 | 1·14 | 0·83, 1·55 | |
Post-secondary graduate | 1·00 | Ref. | 1·00 | Ref. | 0·0004 |
Income per household unit | |||||
<900 €/month | 0·98 | 0·66, 1·44 | 1·03 | 0·63, 1·69 | |
900–2700 €/month | 1·00 | Ref. | 1·00 | Ref. | |
>2700 €/month | 1·21 | 0·91, 1·62 | 0·89 | 0·60, 1·31 | |
Refuses to answer | 0·99 | 0·68, 1·44 | 0·99 | 0·61, 1·60 | 0·6092 |
Household composition | |||||
No children | 1·00 | Ref. | 1·00 | Ref. | |
One or more children (aged 0–13 years) | 0·72 | 0·53, 0·97 | 0·59 | 0·38, 0·89 | |
One or more adolescents (aged 14–18 years) | 0·89 | 0·53, 1·50 | 0·81 | 0·41, 1·62 | |
Children of both age categories | 0·99 | 0·53, 1·86 | 1·18 | 0·55, 2·53 | 0·2062 |
Sweetened beverage consumption | |||||
Tertile 1 | 1·00 | Ref. | 1·00 | Ref. | |
Tertile 2 | 0·75 | 0·58, 0·99 | 0·90 | 0·63, 1·28 | |
Tertile 3 | 0·67 | 0·51, 0·88 | 0·76 | 0·53, 1·09 | 0·0546 |
Artificially sweetened beverages | |||||
Non-consumer | 1·00 | Ref. | 1·00 | Ref. | |
Consumer | 0·87 | 0·69, 1·09 | 0·93 | 0·69, 1·27 | 0·4723 |
Ref., referent category.
Results from multivariable multinomial regression with all variables included in the model.