Table 4.
Associations between family-environmental factors and daily intake of vegetables by country†, Pro Greens project, 2009
| OR | 95 % CI | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw vegetables | |||
| V modelling, family routine and demand | |||
| Germany, the Netherlands | 1·878 | 1·378, 2·559 | <0·001 |
| Finland, Sweden | 2·617 | 2·118, 3·234 | <0·001 |
| F modelling | |||
| Germany, the Netherlands | 2·014 | 1·486, 2·729 | <0·001 |
| Finland, Sweden | 1·445 | 1·226, 1·703 | <0·001 |
| FV allowing | |||
| Germany, the Netherlands | 2·266 | 1·464, 3·508 | <0·001 |
| Finland, Sweden | 1·336 | 1·066, 1·648 | 0·010 |
| Cooked vegetables | |||
| FV encouragement | |||
| Germany, the Netherlands | 1·464 | 1·157, 1·852 | 0·001 |
| Finland, Sweden | 0·728 | 0·502, 1·057 | 0·095 |
| V modelling, family routine and demand | |||
| Germany, the Netherlands | 3·710 | 2·463, 5·588 | <0·001 |
| Finland, Sweden | 0·964 | 0·609, 1·524 | 0·874 |
Adjusted for gender and age of child, and mother's education level.
Odds ratios derived from multilevel logistic regression analyses, 95 % confidence intervals and P values.
†Stratified analyses were carried out based on the interactions found (see Table 3) between family-environmental factors and whether the country serves a free school lunch (Germany and the Netherlands offer no free school lunches, whereas Finland and Sweden do).