Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 5;18(8):1436–1443. doi: 10.1017/S1368980014001864

Table 5.

Unadjusted and adjusted* odds ratios (and 95 % confidence intervals) for the associations between URI and clusters of dietary pattern at 10 years of age among ALSPAC children, using the ‘processed’ cluster as base outcome

‘Healthy’ cluster ‘Traditional’ cluster ‘Packed lunch’ cluster
OR 95 % CI OR 95 % CI OR 95 % CI
Unadjusted (n 5337)
Urban 1·00 1·00 1·00
Town 1·52 1·15, 2·01 1·09 0·79, 1·50 1·07 0·78, 1·47
Village 1·71 1·33, 2·19 1·18 0·89, 1·58 1·06 0·78, 1·42
Hamlet 2·24 1·48, 3·37 1·68 1·07, 2·65 0·80 0·46, 1·39
P value <0·001 0·10 0·82
Adjusted* (n 5337)
Urban 1·00 1·00 1·00
Town 1·27 0·95, 1·69 1·04 0·76, 1·43 1·04 0·76, 1·43
Village 1·30 1·00, 1·68 1·12 0·84, 1·50 1·01 0·75, 1·37
Hamlet 1·61 1·05, 2·49 1·63 1·03, 2·58 0·79 0·45, 1·37
P value 0·02 0·18 0·85

URI, urban/rural indicator; ALSPAC, Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children.

*

Adjusted for gender, maternal education, maternal age at delivery, highest parental social class and home ownership status. Note: 340 children with dietary data were unassigned to food clusters (290 from ‘urban’, 20 from ‘town’, 25 from ‘village’, 5 from ‘hamlet’).