Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 11;16(12):2124–2131. doi: 10.1017/S1368980013000153

Table 1.

Estimates of relative risk used in the analyses for highly exposed and moderately exposed individuals

Nutritional exposure
Fruit and vegetables Fibre Fat Saturated fat
Health outcome RR 95% CI RR 95% CI RR 95% CI RR 95% CI
IHD
High risk 1·93* 1·08, 3·51 1·33† 1·10, 1·63
Moderate risk 1·30* 1·03, 1·65 1·10† 1·03, 1·18
Ischaemic stroke
High risk 1·47* 1·06, 2·05
Moderate risk 1·17* 1·02, 1·33
Colorectal cancer
High risk 1·22‡ 1·12, 1·33
Moderate risk 1·07‡ 1·04, 1·10
Lung cancer
High risk 1·29* 1·06, 1·57
Moderate risk 1·11* 1·02, 1·20
Breast cancer
High risk 1·15§ 1·04, 1·27 1·13∥ 1·02, 1·25 1·19∥ 1·05, 1·34
Moderate risk 1·05§ 1·01, 1·09

RR, relative risk.

– indicates that no or insufficient evidence was found for the given association.

*Calculated for the relevant exposure level based RR estimates from Lock et al. (2004)( 10 ).

†Calculated for the relevant exposure level based RR estimates from Pereira et al. (2004)( 21 ).

‡Calculated for the relevant exposure level based RR estimates from Aune et al. (2011)( 22 ).

§Calculated for the relevant exposure level based RR estimates from Dong et al. (2011)( 23 ).

∥RR estimates for high v. low intake from Boyd et al. (2003)( 24 ), no increase in risk was assumed for moderate exposure.