Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 11;16(12):2124–2131. doi: 10.1017/S1368980013000153

Table 2.

The potential impact of the analysed selective taxation scenario. Effect illustrated as absolute (DALY per 100 000 people) and relative (PIF) change in DALY compared with baseline for each association between nutritional exposures and health outcomes and summed for each nutritional exposure

Nutritional exposure
Baseline DALY for Fruit and vegetables Fibre Fat Saturated fat
Health outcome health outcome PIF (%) DALY PIF (%) DALY PIF (%) DALY PIF (%) DALY
IHD 910 2·4 21·9 0·9 7·9
Ischaemic stroke 462* 1·4 6·4
Colorectal cancer 324 0·6 1·9
Lung cancer 502 0·9 4·6
Breast cancer 284 0·4 1·2 0·8 2·4 0·6 1·8
Total change in DALY for exposure
Sum 32·9 11·0 2·4 1·8
95% CI 10·3, 58·2 5·6, 17·1 0·5, 4·4 0·5, 3·1

DALY, disability-adjusted life years; PIF, potential impact fraction.

– indicates that no or insufficient evidence was found for the given association.

*WHO's estimate of burden of disease from stroke covers both ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke. However, only ischaemic stroke was associated with intake of fruit and vegetables( 10 ). Assuming equal burden of disease from the two outcomes, burden of disease from ischaemic stroke was calculated as the relative share of ischaemic stroke in Denmark (80–85%)( 32 ).