Table 2.

Results of linear regression analysis on the relationship between intake of total SCB/SCB excluding 100 % fruit juices at age 13 years and adult weight status (%total fat, %trunk fat and BMI) 25–30 years later in 114 males of the Amsterdam Growth and Health Longitudinal Study

	%Total fat			%Trunk fat			BMI (kg/m2)
	β	95 % CI	P value	β	95 % CI	P value	β	95 % CI	P value
Intake of total SCB (servings/d)
Model 1	0·81	−0·29, 1·90	0·15	1·15	−0·33, 2·62	0·13	0·17	−0·43, 0·77	0·58
Model 2	0·78	−0·30, 1·87	0·16	1·12	−0·35, 2·60	0·13	0·14	−0·43, 0·71	0·62
Model 3	0·77	−0·33, 1·87	0·17	1·07	−0·42, 2·56	0·16	0·09	−0·47, 0·65	0·76
Model 4	0·86	−0·22, 1·94	0·12	1·20	−0·26, 2·67	0·11	0·10	−0·47, 0·67	0·73
Intake of SCB excluding 100 % fruit juices (servings/d)
Model 1	1·16	0·05, 2·26	0·04	1·66	0·17, 3·15	0·03	0·33	−0·28, 0·95	0·28
Model 2	1·11	0·01, 2·21	0·05	1·61	0·13, 3·10	0·03	0·29	−0·30, 0·87	0·33
Model 3	1·10	−0·02, 2·21	0·05	1·57	0·07, 3·08	0·04	0·24	−0·34, 0·81	0·42
Model 4	1·14	0·04, 2·23	0·04	1·62	0·14, 3·10	0·03	0·24	−0·33, 0·82	0·41

SCB, sugar-containing beverages; %total fat, percentage of total body fat; %trunk fat, percentage of trunk fat.

Model 1, crude model; Model 2, adjusted for BMI at baseline; Model 3, adjusted for BMI at baseline, developmental age and physical activity level; Model 4, adjusted for BMI at baseline, developmental age, physical activity level and total energy intake.