Table 3.

Results of linear regression analysis on the relationship between intake of total SCB/SCB excluding 100 % fruit juices at age 13 years and adult weight status (%total fat, %trunk fat and BMI) 25–30 years later in 124 females of the Amsterdam Growth and Health Longitudinal Study

	%Total fat			%Trunk fat			BMI (kg/m2)
	β	95 % CI	P-value	β	95 % CI	P-value	β	95 % CI	P-value
Intake of total SCB (servings/d)
Model 1	−1·48	−3·01, 0·04	0·06	−1·48	−3·38, 0·42	0·13	−0·37	−1·23, 0·48	0·39
Model 2	−1·12	−2·66, 0·42	0·15	−1·13	−3·06, 0·80	0·25	0·17	−0·57, 0·92	0·65
Model 3	−1·16	−2·70, 0·39	0·14	−1·17	−3·12, 0·77	0·23	0·16	−0·59, 0·90	0·68
Model 4	−1·20	−2·80, 0·40	0·14	−1·32	−3·33, 0·69	0·20	0·13	−0·64, 0·90	0·73
Intake of SCB excluding 100 % fruit juices (servings/d)
Model 1	−1·12	−2·78, 0·54	0·18	−1·14	−3·20, 0·92	0·28	−0·09	−1·02, 0·83	0·84
Model 2	−0·71	−2·38, 0·96	0·40	−0·74	−2·83, 1·36	0·49	0·52	−0·29, 1·32	0·21
Model 3	−0·72	−2·40, 0·97	0·40	−0·77	−2·88, 1·35	0·48	0·44	−0·37, 1·24	0·28
Model 4	−0·72	−2·44, 1·01	0·41	−0·85	−3·02, 1·31	0·44	0·43	−0·39, 1·25	0·30

SCB, sugar-containing beverages; %total fat, percentage of total body fat; %trunk fat, percentage of trunk fat.

Model 1, crude model; Model 2, adjusted for BMI at baseline; Model 3, adjusted for BMI at baseline, developmental age and physical activity level; Model 4, adjusted for BMI at baseline, developmental age, physical activity level and total energy intake.