Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 17;18(6):951–958. doi: 10.1017/S1368980014001207

Table 3.

Specificity, sensitivity and likelihood ratios for each %BF threshold to predict an adverse cardiometabolic risk profile in ninety-three healthy, prepubertal, Ladino children (aged 7–12 years), Guatemala

%BF range* Sensitivity Specificity LHRpos LHRneg
<18·0 1·00 0·00 1·00
18·0–19·9 1·00 0·01 1·01 0·00
20·0–21·9 1·00 0·04 1·04 0·00
22·0–23·9 1·00 0·07 1·08 0·00
24·0–25·9 1·00 0·14 1·16 0·00
26·0–27·9 1·00 0·27 1·37 0·00
28·0–29·9 1·00 0·38 1·62 0·00
30·0–31·9 1·00 0·53 2·13 0·00
32·0–33·9 0·92 0·63 2·48 0·13
34·0–35·9 0·92 0·79 4·37 0·11
36·0–37·9 0·92 0·83 5·30 0·10
38·0–39·9 0·75 0·90 7·59 0·28
40·0–41·9 0·67 0·96 18·00 0·35
42·0–43·9 0·33 0·98 13·50 0·68
44·0–45·9 0·17 1·00 0·83
≥46·0 0·00 1·00 1·00

%BF, body fat percentage; LHR, likelihood ratio; pos, positive; neg, negative; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment–insulin resistance index; TC, total cholesterol; HDL-C, HDL-cholesterol.

*

For each %BF demarcation range, adverse CVD risk profile is defined as HOMA-IR ≥ 3·16 and/or TC:HDL-C ≥ 4·5.

Sensitivity/(1 – specificity).

(1 – Sensitivity)/specificity.