Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2022 Dec 16;29(8):763–774. doi: 10.1017/S1355617722000881

Table 3.

Associations between the Locus Coeruleus and Subjective Cognitive Decline (n=381).

Outcomes:
Subjective Cognitive Decline Subjective Memory Decline Subjective Executive Function Decline Subjective Language Decline Subjective Visuospatial Decline

Predictors: β (95%CI) p * β (95%CI) p * β (95%CI) p * β (95%CI) p * β (95%CI) p *

Participant-Rated Decline
Model 1a.
 Rostral-middle LCCNR
−.18 (−.29 to −.07) .001 −.15 (−.26 to −.04) .007 −.16 (−.27 to −.05) .005 −.14 (−.25 to −.03) .012 −.15 (−.26 to −.04) .010
 Caudal LCCNR .02 (−.08 to .12) .860 −.0003 (−.10 to .10) .995 −.004 (−.11 to .10) .946 .04 (−.07 to .14) .618 .03 (−.08 to .13) .789
Young-adult Cognitive Ability −.01 (−.11 to .09) .860 .001 (−.10 to .10) .995 .03 (−.07 to .13) .906 .02 (−.08 to .12) .638 −.10 (−.20 to .0003) .128
Age (years) .08 (−.02 to .18) .268 .08 (−.02 to .18) .195 .03 (−.07 to .13) .906 .13 (.03 to .23) .033 −.003 (−.10 to .10) .949
Depressive Symptoms .26 (.16 to .36) <.001 .20 (.10 to .30) <.001 .23 (.13 to .33) <.001 .25 (.15 to .35) <.001 .18 (.08 to .28) .005
Physical Morbidities .09 (−.01 to .18) .860 .13 (.03 to .22) .033 .02 (−.08 to .12) .906 .08 (−.02 to .18) .208 .05 (−.05 to .15) .612
Informant-Rated Decline
Model 2a.
 Rostral-middle LCCNR
−.10 (−.21 to .003) .057 −.01 (−.13 to .11) .865 −.05 (−.14 to .05) .356 −.01 (−.18 to .17) .938 −.03 (−.15 to .08) .577
 Caudal LCCNR .05 (−.05 to .15) .713 .06 (−.04 to .17) .593 .05 (−.04 to .14) .433 .10 (−.04 to .25) .796 .08 (−.02 to .18) .373
Young-adult Cognitive Ability −.02 (−.12 to .09) .844 −.11 (−.21 to −.01) .145 −.07 (−.16 to .02) .310 −.02 (−.18 to .14) .796 −.06 (−.18 to .06) .485
Age (years) −.01 (−.12 to .10) .844 .03 (−.08 to .14) .658 .10 (.01 to .19) .135 −.05 (−.21 to .12) .796 .09 (−.03 to .20) .373
Depressive Symptoms −.03 (−.12 to .07) .844 .02 (−.07 to .12) .658 −.04 (−.13 to .05) .465 .02 (−.12 to .16) .796 −.04 (−.15 to .08) .533
Physical Morbidities .07 (−.04 to .17) .713 −.02 (−.12 to .08) .658 .02 (−.07 to .10) .666 −.02 (−.19 to .14) .796 −.05 (−.18 to .07) .485

Notes. CNR=contrast-to-noise ratio; LC=Locus Coeruleus. Each column represents an ECOG subscale regressed on predictors shown in the rows. Rows under “Participant-Rated Decline” show effects when predicting respective ECOG subscales using participant ratings; rows under the “Informant-Rated Decline” show effects when predicting respective ECOG subscales using informant ratings. Models were assessed in a general estimating equation accounting for related observations between twins in the same pair. Models were adjusted for age, depressive symptoms measured by the Center of Epidemiological Studies – Depression Scale (CESD), and physical morbidities.

*

P-values for effects outside of the hypothesized relationship with rostral-middle LC have been corrected for multiple testing using FDR.