Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 2;11:1133696. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1133696

Table 3.

Summary of the indirect effects.

Estimate SE 95% CI
Model 1
T1 PYD → T2 CESD → T3 IGD −0.029 0.010 [−0.054, −0.014]
T1 PYD → T2 CESD → T3 CBV −0.006 0.010 [−0.026, 0.012]
T1 PYD → T3 IGD → T3 CBV −0.033 0.016 [−0.072, −0.012]
T1 PYD → T2 CESD → T3 IGD → T3 CBV −0.005 0.003 [−0.012, −0.001]
Model 2
T1 PYD → T2 CESD → T3 CBV −0.010 0.011 [−0.033, 0.009]
T1 PYD → T2 CESD → T3 IGD −0.028 0.010 [−0.052, −0.013]
T1 PYD → T3 CBV → T3 IGD −0.019 0.008 [−0.039, −0.007]
T1 PYD → T2 CESD → T3 CBV → T3 IGD −0.001 0.002 [−0.007, 0.001]

PYD = Positive youth development attributes; CESD = Depression; CBV = Cyberbullying/victimization; IGD = Internet gaming disorder; T1 = Time 1, T2 = Time 2, T3 = Time 3. Standardized coefficients are reported.