Table 3.
Summary of the indirect effects.
| Estimate | SE | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | |||
| T1 PYD → T2 CESD → T3 IGD | −0.029 | 0.010 | [−0.054, −0.014] |
| T1 PYD → T2 CESD → T3 CBV | −0.006 | 0.010 | [−0.026, 0.012] |
| T1 PYD → T3 IGD → T3 CBV | −0.033 | 0.016 | [−0.072, −0.012] |
| T1 PYD → T2 CESD → T3 IGD → T3 CBV | −0.005 | 0.003 | [−0.012, −0.001] |
| Model 2 | |||
| T1 PYD → T2 CESD → T3 CBV | −0.010 | 0.011 | [−0.033, 0.009] |
| T1 PYD → T2 CESD → T3 IGD | −0.028 | 0.010 | [−0.052, −0.013] |
| T1 PYD → T3 CBV → T3 IGD | −0.019 | 0.008 | [−0.039, −0.007] |
| T1 PYD → T2 CESD → T3 CBV → T3 IGD | −0.001 | 0.002 | [−0.007, 0.001] |
PYD = Positive youth development attributes; CESD = Depression; CBV = Cyberbullying/victimization; IGD = Internet gaming disorder; T1 = Time 1, T2 = Time 2, T3 = Time 3. Standardized coefficients are reported.