Skip to main content

This is a preprint.

It has not yet been peer reviewed by a journal.

The National Library of Medicine is running a pilot to include preprints that result from research funded by NIH in PMC and PubMed.

bioRxiv logoLink to bioRxiv
[Preprint]. 2023 Jun 7:2023.06.06.543940. [Version 1] doi: 10.1101/2023.06.06.543940

High Coverage Highly Accurate Long-Read Sequencing of a Mouse Neuronal Cell Line Using the PacBio Revio Sequencer

Juana G Manuel 1,#, Hillary B Heins 1,#, Sandra Crocker 2, Julie A Neidich 2,3, Lisa Sadzewicz 4, Luke Tallon 4, Tychele N Turner 1,*
PMCID: PMC10274723  PMID: 37333171

Abstract

Recently, Pacific Biosciences released a new highly accurate long-read sequencer called the Revio System that is projected to generate 30× HiFi whole-genome sequencing for the human genome within one sequencing SMRT Cell. Mouse and human genomes are similar in size. In this study, we sought to test this new sequencer by characterizing the genome and epigenome of the mouse neuronal cell line Neuro-2a. We generated long-read HiFi whole-genome sequencing on three Revio SMRT Cells, achieving a total coverage of 98×, with 30×, 32×, and 36× coverage respectively for each of the three Revio SMRT Cells. We performed several tests on these data including single-nucleotide variant and small insertion detection using GPU-accelerated DeepVariant, structural variant detection with pbsv, methylation detection with pb-CpG-tools, and generating de novo assemblies with the HiCanu and hifiasm assemblers. Overall, we find consistency across SMRT Cells in coverage, detection of variation, methylation, and de novo assemblies for each of the three SMRT Cells.

Keywords: Pacific Biosciences, PacBio, Revio, HiFi, long-read whole-genome sequencing, long-read WGS, neuronal, cell line

BACKGROUND

Highly accurate long-read whole-genome sequencing (WGS) (1) has been available for several years, but until recently has been comparatively expensive for the generation of 30× human genome coverage relative to short-read sequencing. Within the last year, PacBio HiFi sequencing has expanded to a new sequencer (the Pacific Biosciences Revio System) that allows for the generation of a 30× human genome in one Revio SMRT Cell with a significant reduction in cost. The human genome is estimated to be 3.055 billion-base pairs (2) and the mouse genome is estimated to be 2.731 billion base pairs (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/assembly/GCF_000001635.20/). We sought to test the sequencing capabilities on Revio and chose the mouse neuronal cell line Neuro-2a for this research assessment. Neuro-2a is a cell line that has been utilized in >1000 papers (based on a PubMed search on May 22, 2023) and in particular, has also been used in the ENCODE project (3) (https://www.encodeproject.org/search/?type=Biosample&searchTerm=neuro-2a) for studies of regulatory element function (4). Key analyses of long-read WGS include reference-based and assembly-based strategies. More recently, 5mC methylation detection has also become possible with long-read WGS (5). Herein, we describe our analyses of highly accurate long-read WGS of the Neuro-2a cell line.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cell Line

The Neuro-2a Mouse Neuronal Cell Line (ATCC CCL-131, lot # 70041794) at Passage 184 was purchased from ATCC and grown under standard conditions (EMEM medium [ATCC, catalog # 30–2003] + 10% FBS [Gibco 26140–079], and Pen-Strep [Gibco 15140122] in an incubator set at 37°C with 5% CO2).

Karyotype

Neuro-2a cells were initially grown in a 100 mm plate. Cells were then transferred to a T25 flask (TPP 90026) and incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2. These adherent cells were allowed to reach 60 – 70% confluency. The Neuro-2a cells were sent to the Washington University in St. Louis Cytogenetics and Molecular Pathology Core Laboratory. The Neuro-2a cells were treated with a hypotonic solution, fixed, and then stained using the Giemsa (GTG) banding method. 20 metaphases were examined using a microscope and the CytoVision imaging software.

PacBio WGS sample preparation and HiFi sequencing

High Molecular Weight (HMW) DNA samples were generated using Quick-DNA HMW MagBead Kit (Zymo Research D6060). Each sample was prepared following the provided protocol with certain changes. Approximately three million cells were used per sample, and 6–8 samples were combined after collection to acquire enough HMW DNA for sequencing. Liquid sample and Biofluid & Solid Tissue Buffer were changed to 300 μL each. Quick-DNA MagBinding Buffer was changed to 600μL, and MagBinding Beads were changed to 100 μL. When pipette mixing, we mixed with regular pipette tips 3 – 4 times to break up clumps and then used wide bore pipette tips to reduce shearing (Labcon 1199-965-008-9) to continue mixing. DNA Elution Buffer was changed to 150 μL per sample. Samples were combined for quantitation using Qubit dsDNA Broad Range Assay (Invitrogen Q32853). Sample was stored at 4°C to avoid freeze-thaw. The HMW DNA sample was sequenced on a PacBio Revio System sequencer at Maryland Genomics at the Institute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine on three Revio SMRT Cells.

Post-sequencing, the data were analyzed using two main approaches: de novo assembly-based and reference-based workflows. For de novo assembly, two different assemblers were used, including HiCanu (6) version 2.2 and Hifiasm (7) version 0.16.1-r375. For the reference-based workflow, the reads were mapped to the mm10 genome (http://hgdownload.cse.ucsc.edu/goldenpath/mm10/bigZips/mm10.fa.gz) using pbmm2 (8) version 1.10.0 align, followed by merging of the data from three Revio SMRT Cells with SAMtools version 1.6 merge, sorting of the reads with SAMtools sort, and indexing of the bam with SAMtools index. SNV/indel calls were generated using DeepVariant (9) implemented in NVIDIA Parabricks version 4.1.0–1. Structural variants were called using pbsv version 2.9.0. Postcalling SVs were merged using SURVIVOR (10) version 1.0.7 merge with these specific arguments to consider a max distance between breakpoints of 10 bp, take the type of SV into account, take the strand of the SV into account, and to examine SVs at least 50 bp in size. The SVs were then compared using SURVIVOR genComp. 5mC status was detected using pb-CpG-tools (11) aligned_bam_to_cpg_scores version 2.3.1 with the pileup_calling_model.v1.tflite model file and minimum mapq of 30, and minimum coverage of 10.

RESULTS

Karyotype reveals a complex aneuploid genome

Since the Neuro-2a genome is known to be an immortalized cell line and due to a previous genomic workup of this cell line (12), we hypothesized it may be aneuploid. The results of the karyotype analysis (Figure 1) confirmed this idea with a chromosome complement of 79~97<4n>,X/Yx0,-2,-4,-3,-4,-5,-6,-7,-8,-8×2,-9,-10,-11,-13×2,+14,+15×3,+16,+16×2,-18,+19×2,+9–23mar,1–5dmin[cp10]. This cell line was considered to be near tetraploid with 4n=80 and the karyotype features gains and loss of multiple chromosomes as well as no identifiable sex chromosomes. 23 marker chromosomes (including metacentric and submetacentric markers) and up to 5 double minutes (dmin) were observed. A marker chromosome is a structurally rearranged chromosome whose origin cannot be definitively defined. Double minutes (dmin) are acentric fragments that manifest from gene amplification which gives the cells selective advantages for growth and survival. They frequently harbor amplified oncogenes and genes involved in drug resistance.

Figure 1. Karyotype of the Neuro-2a Mouse Hippocampal Neuronal Cell Line.

Figure 1.

(A) First picture is of Neuro-2a the three days after resurrecting and plating the cell line. The second picture is of Neuro-2a in a T25 flask on the day when we sent the cells for karyotyping. Pictures are taken at 10×. (B) The Karyotyping of Neuro-2a was done by the GTW banding method. Metaphase cells had the characteristic of chromosomally abnormal near tetraploid composite karyotype. During karyotyping, there is loss of both sex chromosomes, so since the known sex chromosomes had not been provided, the sex chromosomes could not be determined.

Revio SMRT Cells are consistent in sequencing characteristics

Three PacBio Revio SMRT Cells were sequenced for the Neuro-2a cell line (Table 1). Each SMRT Cell collected kinetics data so that methylation could be detected in the downstream analyses. All three of the SMRT Cells performed within expectation generating 30×, 32×, and 36× genome coverage, respectively. The mean HiFi read length for the SMRT cells was 14,069 bp, 14,103 bp, and 14,066 bp, respectively. This is a bit shorter than the optimal HiFi read length of 20,000 bp. Notably, for computational considerations the file size of each SMRT Cell HiFi bam was 352 GB, 377 GB, and 421 GB, respectively. After mapping to the mm10 genome, the file sizes were 429 GB, 460 GB, and 516 GB, respectively. Combining all three SMRT Cells the genome coverage was 98× and the resulting file size was 1,405 GB.

Table 1.

Sequencing metrics of the three PacBio Revio SMRT Cells

SMRT Cell Number of HiFi Reads HiFi Yield (bp) Mean HiFi Read Length (bp) File Size (GB) Estimated Coverage of the mm10 genome File Size After Mapping to mm10 Reference Genome (GB)
SMRT Cell B01 6,171,479 86,824,002,532 14069 352 30× 429
SMRT Cell A01 6,641,270 93,660,195,338 14103 377 32× 460
SMRT Cell C01 7,489,103 105,342,363,348 14066 421 36× 516
Combined File with Data from All 3 SMRT Cells 20,301,852 285,826,561,218 14079 N/A 98× 1,405

SNV/indel calling, SV calling, and methylation detection are consistent across Revio SMRT Cells

Around the time we sequenced the Neuro-2a genome, NVIDIA also released a new version of their Parabricks software (13) for accelerating genomic analyses. This version (4.1.0–1) included rapid calling of SNVs/indels genome-wide from highly accurate long-read sequencing data. We previously have shown the advantage of GPU acceleration on short-read whole-genome sequencing using Parabricks (14) and sought to test the new version on our Revio HiFi data. For the analysis, we utilized a custom-built Lambda AI Vector Workstation. The workstation contains an AMD Threadripper Pro 5995WX Processer with 64 cores, and 2 NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada GPUs. We ran Parabricks DeepVariant on each of the three SMRT Cells mapped to the mm10 genome independently and saw run times of 1422 seconds, 1542 seconds, and 1740 seconds, respectively (Table 2). Testing was also done on the full dataset at 98× coverage and the analysis ran in 4,585 seconds. This showed that for a 30× genome SNV/indel calling can be performed in <30 minutes. Furthermore, we performed concordance checks between each of the Revio SMRT Cells and the results from the full 98× coverage genome. The concordance, considering both SNVs and INDELs, was 97.9%, 98.0%, and 98.1%, respectively.

Table 2.

SNV/INDEL calling in the three PacBio Revio SMRT Cells

SMRT Cell DeepVariant RunTime* Concordance of SMRT Cell with Full Dataset** (%) Number of SNVs Number of INDELs
SMRT Cell B01 1,422 97.9 7,215,187 2,754,428
SMRT Cell A01 1,542 98.0 7,228,880 2,741,760
SMRT Cell C01 1,740 98.1 7,255,687 2,668,512
Combined File with Data from All 3 SMRT Cells 4,585 100 7,441,882 2,500,894
*

Run on a Lambda AI Vector Workstation with an AMD Threadripper Pro 5995WX Processer with 64 cores, and 2 NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada GPUs (seconds)

**

includes SNVs and INDELs

We compared SVs detected in the full dataset and in each of the Revio SMRT Cells (Table 3) and found high concordance with each pairwise comparison containing at least 88% of the SV calls. Finally, we compared the methylation values genome-wide in pairwise comparisons (Table 4) using a correlation test and found correlation for each pairwise comparison of at least 0.94 for each of the comparisons.

Table 3.

PBSV concordance comparisons for the three PacBio Revio SMRT Cells

Combined File with Data from All 3 SMRT Cells SMRT Cell B01 SMRT Cell A01 SMRT Cell C01
Combined File with Data from All 3 SMRT Cells 1 0.892 0.887 0.897
SMRT Cell B01 0.911 1 0.904 0.907
SMRT Cell A01 0.908 0.905 1 0.907
SMRT Cell C01 0.914 0.904 0.903 1

Table 4.

Correlation of methylation values across three PacBio Revio SMRT Cells

Combined File with Data from All 3 SMRT Cells SMRT Cell B01 SMRT Cell A01 SMRT Cell C01
Combined File with Data from All 3 SMRT Cells 1 0.98 0.98 0.98
SMRT Cell B01 0.98 1 0.95 0.95
SMRT Cell A01 0.98 0.95 1 0.94
SMRT Cell C01 0.98 0.95 0.94 1

de novo assembly of the Neuro-2a genome

Two de novo assemblers (HiCanu (15) and hifiasm (7)) were utilized to test the assembly of the Neuro-2a genome. As noted, the karyotype is quite complex. For this reason, generating a de novo assembly for this cell line can present a challenge. The HiCanu assembler generated consistent assemblies for all three Revio SMRT Cells and a very similar size assembly even at 98× (Table 5). All assemblies were ~2.8 Gbp in size with NG50 contig values between 53 and 64 and overall number of contigs between 1607 and 1877. The NG50 value ranged from 12,743,571 bp to 17,334,001 bp in the assemblies.

Table 5.

HiCanu assembly statistics for the three PacBio Revio SMRT Cells.

SMRT Cell HiCanu v2.2 Number of Contigs HiCanu v2.2 Total Length of Assembly (bp) HiCanu v2.2 NG50 (bp) HiCanu v2.2 NG50 (contigs)
SMRT Cell B01 1,877 2,852,541,213 13,250,075 64
SMRT Cell A01 1,704 2,855,455,359 12,743,571 69
SMRT Cell C01 1,634 2,851,051,228 16,394,244 53
Combined File with Data from All 3 SMRT Cells 1,607 2,860,336,790 17,334,001 58

The hifiasm assembler generated high-quality assemblies for all three Revio SMRT Cells (Table 6). We report statistics for both the hap1 and hap2 assemblies but since this genome is aneuploid we focus on characteristics of the primary assembly (.asm.bp.p_ctg). The assemblies ranged in size from ~2.8 Gbp to ~3.0 Gbp with NG 50 values between 33 and 44 and number of contigs ranging from 1,358 to 2,066. The NG50 value ranged from 21,996,525 bp to 26,122,379 bp in the assemblies.

Table 6.

hifiasm assembly statistics for the three PacBio Revio SMRT Cells

SMRT cell hifiasm.asm.bp.hap1.p_ctg.gfa.ctg NG50 (bp) hifiasm.asm.bp.hap1.p_ctg.gfa.ctg NG50(contigs) hifiasm.asm.bp.hap2.p_ctg.gfa.ctg NG50 (bp) hifiasm.asm.bp.hap2.p_ctg.gfa.ctg NG50 (contigs) hifiasm.asm.bp.p_ctg.gfa.ctg total contigs hifiasm.asm.bp.p_ctg.gfa.ctg NG50 (bp) hifiasm.asm.bp.p_ctg.gfa.ctg NG50 (contigs)
SMRT Cell B01 12,379,411 60 11,459,661 65 1,558 21,996,525 44
SMRT Cell A01 11,538,520 63 11,562,341 66 1,358 22,705,572 38
SMRT Cell C01 15,456,526 49 12,528,891 59 1,657 22,944,273 34
Combined File with Data from All 3 SMRT Cells 17,547,755 45 16,891,061 53 2,066 26,122,379 33

DISCUSSION

Highly accurate long-read WGS on the PacBio Revio System is consistent and can generate 30× genome coverage on one SMRT Cell. We utilized this technology on a neuronal cell line to learn more about the characteristics of Revio HiFi sequencing data and to generate a genome and epigenome of the Neuro-2a cell line for research into neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders. Our analyses of these data showed consistency in small genomic variants, structural variants, methylation, and de novo assembly characteristics. For the de novo assemblies we did not observe a significant improvement in assembly quality using data from all three Revio SMRT Cells together. However, this is likely due to the complexity of the genome as evidenced by the complex karyotype (Figure 1).

ACKNOWLEDMENTS

Funding:

This work was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (R01MH126933). Author Contributions: T.N.T designed the study. J.M. and H.H. performed the cell culture work. S.C. and J.A.N. performed the karyotype. L.S. and L.T. performed the sequencing. T.N.T. analyzed the data. Data and materials availability: The data described in this preprint can be found at Globus link https://app.globus.org/file-manager?origin_id=4865823e-01af-11ee-a924-63e0d97254cd&path=%2F.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (R01MH126933). Author Contributions: T.N.T designed the study. J.M. and H.H. performed the cell culture work. S.C. and J.A.N. performed the karyotype. L.S. and L.T. performed the sequencing. T.N.T. analyzed the data. Data and materials availability: The data described in this preprint can be found at Globus link https://app.globus.org/file-manager?origin_id=4865823e-01af-11ee-a924-63e0d97254cd&path=%2F.

Footnotes

AVAILABILITY AND REQUIREMENTS

The data described in this preprint can be found at Globus link https://app.globus.org/file-manager?origin_id=4865823e-01af-11ee-a924-63e0d97254cd&path=%2F. Since the NCBI SRA does not have Revio as an option for a sequencing type, we have not yet uploaded the data there. We will upload the data there as soon as that is possible as part of BioProject PRJNA938057.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Wenger AM, Peluso P, Rowell WJ, Chang PC, Hall RJ, Concepcion GT, Ebler J, Fungtammasan A, Kolesnikov A, Olson ND, Töpfer A, Alonge M, Mahmoud M, Qian Y, Chin CS, Phillippy AM, Schatz MC, Myers G, DePristo MA, Ruan J, Marschall T, Sedlazeck FJ, Zook JM, Li H, Koren S, Carroll A, Rank DR, Hunkapiller MW. Accurate circular consensus long-read sequencing improves variant detection and assembly of a human genome. Nature biotechnology. 2019;37(10):1155–62. Epub 2019/08/14. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0217-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Nurk S, Koren S, Rhie A, Rautiainen M, Bzikadze AV, Mikheenko A, Vollger MR, Altemose N, Uralsky L, Gershman A, Aganezov S, Hoyt SJ, Diekhans M, Logsdon GA, Alonge M, Antonarakis SE, Borchers M, Bouffard GG, Brooks SY, Caldas GV, Chen NC, Cheng H, Chin CS, Chow W, de Lima LG, Dishuck PC, Durbin R, Dvorkina T, Fiddes IT, Formenti G, Fulton RS, Fungtammasan A, Garrison E, Grady PGS, Graves-Lindsay TA, Hall IM, Hansen NF, Hartley GA, Haukness M, Howe K, Hunkapiller MW, Jain C, Jain M, Jarvis ED, Kerpedjiev P, Kirsche M, Kolmogorov M, Korlach J, Kremitzki M, Li H, Maduro VV, Marschall T, McCartney AM, McDaniel J, Miller DE, Mullikin JC, Myers EW, Olson ND, Paten B, Peluso P, Pevzner PA, Porubsky D, Potapova T, Rogaev EI, Rosenfeld JA, Salzberg SL, Schneider VA, Sedlazeck FJ, Shafin K, Shew CJ, Shumate A, Sims Y, Smit AFA, Soto DC, Sović I, Storer JM, Streets A, Sullivan BA, Thibaud-Nissen F, Torrance J, Wagner J, Walenz BP, Wenger A, Wood JMD, Xiao C, Yan SM, Young AC, Zarate S, Surti U, McCoy RC, Dennis MY, Alexandrov IA, Gerton JL, O’Neill RJ, Timp W, Zook JM, Schatz MC, Eichler EE, Miga KH, Phillippy AM. The complete sequence of a human genome. Science (New York, NY). 2022;376(6588):44–53. Epub 2022/04/01. doi: 10.1126/science.abj6987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.ENCODE. The ENCODE (ENCyclopedia Of DNA Elements) Project. Science (New York, NY). 2004;306(5696):636–40. Epub 2004/10/23. doi: 10.1126/science.1105136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kircher M, Xiong C, Martin B, Schubach M, Inoue F, Bell RJA, Costello JF, Shendure J, Ahituv N. Saturation mutagenesis of twenty disease-associated regulatory elements at single basepair resolution. Nature communications. 2019;10(1):3583. Epub 2019/08/10. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11526-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tse OYO, Jiang P, Cheng SH, Peng W, Shang H, Wong J, Chan SL, Poon LCY, Leung TY, Chan KCA, Chiu RWK, Lo YMD. Genome-wide detection of cytosine methylation by single molecule real-time sequencing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2021;118(5):e2019768118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2019768118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nurk S, Walenz BP, Rhie A, Vollger MR, Logsdon GA, Grothe R, Miga KH, Eichler EE, Phillippy AM, Koren S. HiCanu: accurate assembly of segmental duplications, satellites, and allelic variants from high-fidelity long reads. Genome research. 2020;30(9):1291–305. Epub 2020/08/18. doi: 10.1101/gr.263566.120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cheng H, Concepcion GT, Feng X, Zhang H, Li H. Haplotype-resolved de novo assembly using phased assembly graphs with hifiasm. Nature methods. 2021. doi: 10.1038/s41592-02001056-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.PacBio. pbmm2: https://github.com/PacificBiosciences/pbmm2.
  • 9.Poplin R, Chang PC, Alexander D, Schwartz S, Colthurst T, Ku A, Newburger D, Dijamco J, Nguyen N, Afshar PT, Gross SS, Dorfman L, McLean CY, DePristo MA. A universal SNP and small-indel variant caller using deep neural networks. Nature biotechnology. 2018;36(10):983–7. Epub 2018/09/25. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jeffares DC, Jolly C, Hoti M, Speed D, Shaw L, Rallis C, Balloux F, Dessimoz C, Bähler J, Sedlazeck FJ. Transient structural variations have strong effects on quantitative traits and reproductive isolation in fission yeast. Nature communications. 2017;8:14061. Epub 2017/01/25. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.PacBio. pb-CpG-tools: https://github.com/PacificBiosciences/pb-CpG-tools.
  • 12.Do J-H, Kim I-S, Ko H-M, Choi D-K. High Resolution Genomic Profile of Neuro2a Murine Neuroblastoma Cell Line by Array-based Comparative Genomic Hybridization. Journal of Life Science. 2009;19(4):449–56. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.NVIDIA. Parabricks: https://docs.nvidia.com/clara/parabricks/4.1.0/.
  • 14.Ng JK, Vats P, Fritz-Waters E, Sarkar S, Sams EI, Padhi EM, Payne ZL, Leonard S, West MA, Prince C, Trani L, Jansen M, Vacek G, Samadi M, Harkins TT, Pohl C, Turner TN. de novo variant calling identifies cancer mutation signatures in the 1000 Genomes Project. Human mutation. 2022. Epub 2022/09/03. doi: 10.1002/humu.24455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nurk S, Walenz BP, Rhie A, Vollger MR, Logsdon GA, Grothe R, Miga KH, Eichler EE, Phillippy AM, Koren S. HiCanu: accurate assembly of segmental duplications, satellites, and allelic variants from high-fidelity long reads. bioRxiv. 2020:2020.03.14.992248. doi: 10.1101/2020.03.14.992248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from bioRxiv are provided here courtesy of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Preprints

RESOURCES