Skip to main content
[Preprint]. 2023 Jun 8:2023.06.07.543941. [Version 1] doi: 10.1101/2023.06.07.543941

Table 1.

Participant characteristics.

NWT (N = 14) OWT (N = 11)
Mean (SE) Male (N = 8) Female (N = 6) Male (N = 4) Female (N = 7)
Age (years) 30.2 (2.0) 26.6 (2.5) 30.3 (3.1) 33.0 (1.8)
BMI (kg/m2) 22.2 (0.6) 21.5 (0.6) 29.1 (2.0)a,b 31.5 (2.0)a,b
Lean body mass (kg) 60.5 (2.1) 45.4 (1.8)a 76.1 (3.4)a,b 54.7 (3.3)c
Total fat mass (kg) 9.6 (0.9) 14.8 (4.0) 21.6 (4.3)b 36.0 (3.4)a,b,c
Android fat (g) 569.5 (111.8) 772.0 (117.9) 2033 (593.7)a 2853 (371.7)a,b
VAT (g) 217.1 (35.0) 78.8 (28.5) 740.8 (178.3)a,b 524.0 (61.7)a,b
SAT (g) 352.6 (86.9) 693.2 (114.4) 1293 (415.9) 2329 (357.1)a,b
Gynoid (g) 1386 (159.7) 3040 (353.7) 3425 (586.4) 6967 (765.7)a,b,c
HOMA-IR 0.86 (0.13) 0.98 (0.25) 1.97 (0.27)a 1.35 (0.30)

SE: standard error; BMI: body mass index; VAT: visceral adipose tissue; SAT: subcutaneous adipose tissue; HOMA-IR: Homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance; NWT: normal weight trained runners; OWT: overweight or obese trained runners.

a:

p-value < 0.05 compared to NWT males;

b:

p-value < 0.05 compared to NWT females;

c:

p-value < 0.05 compared to OWT males.