Table 2. .
Comparing the experimentally determined Janelia hemibrain connectome (Scheffer et al., 2020) against our stochastically generated connectome using pconn = 0.15
| Connectome | # Neurons | Sparsity | Avg. vertex deg | Avg. edge str |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electron microscopy experimental data (Janelia) | 21,739 | 0.75% | 326.64 | 4.04 |
| Stochastically generated from FlyCircuit data | 19,902 | 0.46% ± 0.01 | 181.79 ± 0.07 | 2.32 ± 0.01 |
| Truncated connectomes: Hemibrain only | ||||
| Electron microscopy experimental data (Janelia) | 11,461 | 0.75% ± 0.01 | 172.73 ± 2.23 | 4.01 ± 0.09 |
| Stochastically Generated from FlyCircuit Data | 11,461 | 0.76% ± 0.01 | 173.36 ± 0.09 | 2.58 ± 0.02 |
Note. Both connectomic datasets were appropriately resized so that they span the same neuropils in the Drosophila hemibrain. The mean (± standard deviation) values for the sparsity, degree, and strength, were calculated using a total of 100 randomly sampled connectomes.