TABLE 2.
Results of hierarchical regression analyses.
| Variables | Proactive work behavior | Task significance | |||||
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 | Model 6 | Model 7 | |
| Gender | 0.12*** | 0.11*** | 0.08*** | 0.17*** | 0.15*** | 0.16*** | 0.16*** |
| Position1 | 0.31*** | 0.28*** | 0.25*** | 0.25*** | 0.17** | 0.14** | 0.13* |
| Position2 | 0.28*** | 0.27*** | 0.24*** | 0.17 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Education1 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.05 | 0.26* | 0.27* | 0.26* | 0.26* |
| Education2 | 0.23 | 0.01 | 0 | 0.10** | 0.06 | 0.07* | 0.07* |
| Initiated task interdependence | 0.13*** | 0.05** | 0.36*** | 0.35*** | 0.11 | ||
| Received task interdependence | −0.02 | −0.02 | 0.004 | 0.02 | 0.03 | ||
| Task significance | 0.21*** | 0.36*** | 0.37*** | ||||
| Initiated task interdependence × Self-esteem | 0.06 | ||||||
| Received task interdependence × Self-esteem | −0.12* | ||||||
| R 2 | 0.069 | 0.101 | 0.173 | 0.036 | 0.186 | 0.238 | 0.241 |
| ΔR2 | 0.069*** | 0.032*** | 0.072*** | 0.036*** | 0.15*** | 0.052*** | 0.003 |
N = 1,330, *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.