Table 6.
Results from three multivariable linear regression models for the association between the log10-transformed bulk milk somatic cell count (BMSCC), total bacterial count (TBC), and total non-aureus staphylococci count (TNAS), with farm-level factors in Bangladesh expressed as co-efficient (β), 95% confidence interval (95% CI), and P values
| Models | Variable name | Categories | β ± SE | 95% C. I. | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1: Bulk milk somatic cell count a | |||||
| Intercept | 4.86 ± 0.09 | 4.67 to 5.04 | < 0.001 | ||
| Season | Winter | Reference | < 0.001 | ||
| Late autumn | 0.14 ± 0.09 | -0.04 to 0.31 | |||
| Spring | 0.51 ± 0.08 | 0.36 to 0.67 | |||
| Rearing system | Semi-Intensive | Reference | 0.002 | ||
| Household | 0.18 ± 0.08 | 0.01 to 0.34 | |||
| Free-range/bathan | 0.21 ± 0.09 | 0.03 to 0.39 | |||
| Semi-bathan | 0.24 ± 0.07 | 0.10 to 0.37 | |||
| Intensive | 0.62 ± 0.17 | 0.27 to 0.97 | |||
| Model 2: Total bacteria count b | |||||
| Intercept | 4.59 ± 0.18 | 4.23 to 4.95 | < 0.001 | ||
| Season | Late autumn | Reference | 0.018 | ||
| Spring | 0.54 ± 0.20 | 0.14 to 0.93 | |||
| Winter | 0.63 ± 0.30 | 0.05 to 1.22 | |||
| The water source used for cleaning the milk containers | Tube-well water | Reference | 0.026 | ||
| River water | 0.22 ± 0.24 | -0.25 to 0.68 | |||
| Pond water | 0.50 ± 0.18 | 0.14 to 0.86 | |||
| Model 3: Total non-aureus staphylococci count c | |||||
| Intercept | 3.98 ± 0.12 | 3.75 to 4.22 | |||
| Geographical area of the farms | River basin | Reference | < 0.001 | ||
| Inland | 0.38 ± 0.23 | -0.08 to 0.84 | |||
| Coastal or semi-costal area | 0.87 ± 0.18 | 0.51 to 1.22 | |||
aBased on records from 116 buffalo farms
bBased on records from 111 buffalo farms
cBased on records from 109 buffalo farms