Table 1A.
S.No. | Study | Study design | Patients | Total IgE levels | Assessments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | Braunstahl et al., 201330 (eXpeRience registry) | A 2-year, open-label, observational registry | Patients with uncontrolled, persistent allergic asthma who had initiated omalizumab within the 15 weeks prior to start of the study (N = 943) | Baseline IgE: mean ± SD, 323.1 ± 460.9 IU/mL; range, 8–7670 IU/mL | Effectiveness of omalizumab in terms of: physician's GETE, exacerbation rate, symptoms, rescue medication use, OCS use, healthcare resource utilization including hospitalization, ER visits and unscheduled doctor visits, missed work/school days and safety |
2. | Maselli et al., 201326 | Retrospective, case-control study from January 2006 to December 2010 | Patients aged ≥12 years (N = 120) with moderate-to-severe asthma | Patients were divided into two groups:
|
Effectiveness of omalizumab was assessed in the two groups in terms of: FEV1, ACT score, episodes of systemic corticosteroid use, emergency department visits |
3. | Zielen et al., 201325 | Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled study with omalizumab treatment period of 12–14 weeks | Patients with allergic asthma aged between 18 and 65 years with body weight ranging from 40 to 150 kg (N = 50) | Patients were grouped into:
|
Efficacy of omalizumab at 8 and 16 weeks in terms of: early-phase allergic response (maximum percentage drop in FEV1 during first 30 min post ABP test); FEV1 AUC (30 min after APB); late-phase allergic response (maximum percentage drop in FEV1 3–8 h post ABP test); free serum IgE; FeNO |
4. | Hew et al., 201628 | A 6-month analysis of Australian Xolair Registry, a multicenter, Investigator Initiated Trial observational study registry | Patients with SAA aged ≥12 years (N = 179) | Patients were grouped into:
|
Effectiveness of omalizumab in patients treated above the recommended dosing ranges in terms of: ACQ score, AQLQ score, and FEV1Effectiveness analysis in a subgroup of patients in the above-range group due to IgE level alone (n = 19) and due to both IgE level and body weight (n = 23) |
5. | Chipps et al., 201729 and Casale et al., 201931 (PROSPERO study) | A US-based, 48-week, multicenter, prospective study on the effectiveness of omalizumab of omalizumab | Patients aged ≥12 years with allergic asthma, who had initiated treatment with omalizumab (N = 806) | Median (min, max) total IgE level at baseline:
|
Effectiveness of omalizumab in terms of: exacerbation rate, hospitalizations, lung function, asthma control (ACT score) and safety |
6. | Humbert et al., 201832 (STELLAIR study) | A 1-year, multicenter, non-interventional, retrospective, observational study using medical records of French patients treated with omalizumab | Patients aged ≥6 years with severe allergic asthma (N = 872) | Median (range) total IgE level at baseline:
|
Effectiveness of omalizumab was assessed after 4–6 months of treatment in terms of physician's GETE, reduction in annualized exacerbation rate and combination of both definitions, according to blood eosinophils count. Response to treatment was also described in terms of proportion of patients with excellent/good GETE score and with ≥40% reduction in annual exacerbation rate. Reductions in hospitalization and changes in the use of anti-asthmatic medications were also evaluated during the 12 months of treatment |
7. | Wang et al., 201833 | Case report of patients with omalizumab, initiated between January 2008 and December 2015 | Children and adolescents (<18 years) with inadequately controlled, moderate-to-severe allergic asthma (N = 11) | Mean serum IgE:
|
Effectiveness of omalizumab in terms of corticosteroid use, hospitalizations, emergency department visits, ACT score during 12 months of treatment |
8. | Diaz et al., 201652 and Singh et al. 201927 (REALITY study) | An 8-year, real-life, retrospective study | Patients with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma aged between 12 and 65 years (N = 198) | Patients were classified into 2 groups based on IgE level:
|
Response to omalizumab was assessed in terms of three modules:
|
9. | Sesé et al. 201951 | Subgroup analysis of children included in the prospective, monocentric, Severe Asthma Molecular Phenotype Paris cohort, conducted from January 2011 to December 2015 | Patients with severe asthma and/or steroid-refractory asthma aged 6–18 years who had been treated with omalizumab for ≥4 months | Patients were categorized into three clusters based on response to omalizumab:
|
|
ABP, allergic bronchoprovocative test; ACT, Asthma Control Test; ACQ, Asthma Control Questionnaire; AE adverse event; AQLQ, Asthma-related Quality of Life Questionnaire; AUC, area under the curve; ER, emergency room; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 s; FVC, forced vital capacity; FeNO, fractional exhaled nitric oxide; GETE, Global Evaluation of Treatment Effectiveness; IgE, immunoglobulin E; IIT, investigator initiated trials; MCID, minimal clinically important difference; N, total number of patients; n, number of patients in each group; OCS, oral corticosteroid; SAE, serious AE; SD, standard deviation.