Table 3.
First Author | Year | Design | Sample size | Avg duration (m) | Conc (%) | Outcome Assessment | Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fox[4] | 1984 | Case series + Crossover | 15 | 10.3 | 33 | RB surface staining, subjective symptom score | Improvement noted in both surface staining and symptom score |
Tsubota[5] | 1999 | Case series | 12 | 0.5 | 20 | RB & FS surface staining, subjective symptom score | Improvement noted in both surface staining and symptom score |
Tananuvat[17] | 2001 | RCT | 12 | 2 | 20 | RB & FS surface staining, Schirmer’s test, TBUT, CIC, subjective symptom score | No statistical difference between treatment and control groups |
Ogawa[18] | 2003 | Case series | 14 | 19.4 | 20 | RB & FS surface staining, Schirmer’s test, TBUT, CIC Corneal sensitivity score, subjective symptom score | Improvement in symptom score, surface staining scores & TBUT at 4 weeksa |
Noble[19] | 2004 | Randomized controlled crossover trial | 16 | 3 | 50 | RB & FS surface staining, Schirmer’s test, fluorescein clearance test, subjective symptom score, CIC | Improvement in symptom score and impression cytology grading favoring ASb |
Kojima[20] | 2005 | RCT | 23 | 0.5 | 20 | RB & FS surface staining, Schirmer’s test, TBUT, subjective symptom score | Improvement in surface staining, TBUT and subjective symptom score favoring ASb |
Noda- Tsuruya[21] | 2006 | RCT | 27 | 6 | NA | RB & FS surface staining, Schirmer’s test, TBUT & subjective symptom scores | Improvement in TBUT and RB staining favoring ASb |
Yoon[22] | 2007 | Prospective case-control study | 48 | 2 | 20 | RB & FS surface staining, Schirmer’s test, TBUT, CIC, corneal sensitivity score, tear clearance rate, subjective symptom score | Improvement in surface staining, TBUT, grade of conjunctival squamous metaplasia, goblet cell density, and subjective symptom scoreb,c |
Lee[23] | 2008 | Case series | 23 | 17.3 | 20 | Surface staining, subjective symptoms | Improvement in surface staining and subjective symptomsd |
Urzua[24] | 2012 | Double-blind RCT | 12 | 0.5 | 20 | Surface staining (OXFORD scale), TBUT, OSDI | Improvement favoring AS in OSDI scoreb |
Lopez- Garcia[25] | 2013 | Double-blind RCT | 26 | 2 | 20 | RB & FS surface staining, Schirmer’s test, TBUT, CIC, subjective symptom scores | Improvement in all parameters except Schirmer’s test with treatmente |
Celebi[26] | 2014 | Double-blind RCT | 20 | 1 | 20 | Surface staining (OXFORD scale), Schirmer’s test, TBUT, OSDI | Improvement in symptom score (OSDI) & TBUT favoring ASb |
Hussain[27] | 2014 | Case series | 63 | 12 | 50 | Surface staining (OXFORD scale), Schirmer’s test, TBUT, OSDI | Improvement in surface staining, Schirmer’s test, and symptom scoref |
Hwang[28] | 2014 | Comparative study | 34 | 1 | 50 | Surface staining (OXFORD scale), Schirmer’s test, TBUT, subjective symptom score | Improvement in all parameters in the patients with primary Sjogren syndromeg |
Liu[29] | 2015 | Case series | 28 | 42.3 | 20 | RB & FS surface staining, Schirmer’s test, TBUT | Improvement in surface staining scores & TBUTb,h |
Mahelkova[30] | 2017 | Case series | 26 | 3 | 20 | Surface staining (OXFORD scale), OSDI, IVCM | Improvement in surface staining, OSDI scores, & density of basal epithelial cells on IVCM after treatment |
aBeyond 12 months of follow-up, 7 out of 14 patients maintained good response; bno differences in one or more of the other parameters studied; cgreater improvement with umbilical cord serum compared to autologous serum in symptom score, surface staining and goblet cell density; donly descriptive statistics were used for analysis; emore improvement in group where sodium hyaluronate was used as diluent, compared to group where saline was used as diluent; fpotential confounding factor: concomitant use of scleral contact lenses by 33% of patients; gno improvement in parameters in patients with secondary Sjogren’s syndrome; hpotential confounding factor: concomitant use of punctal plugs by 12 patients