Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 5;71(4):1357–1363. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_2756_22

Table 3.

Summary of studies on outcomes of autologous serum eye drops in aqueous deficiency dry eye disease (minimum sample size of 10)

First Author Year Design Sample size Avg duration (m) Conc (%) Outcome Assessment Outcomes
Fox[4] 1984 Case series + Crossover 15 10.3 33 RB surface staining, subjective symptom score Improvement noted in both surface staining and symptom score
Tsubota[5] 1999 Case series 12 0.5 20 RB & FS surface staining, subjective symptom score Improvement noted in both surface staining and symptom score
Tananuvat[17] 2001 RCT 12 2 20 RB & FS surface staining, Schirmer’s test, TBUT, CIC, subjective symptom score No statistical difference between treatment and control groups
Ogawa[18] 2003 Case series 14 19.4 20 RB & FS surface staining, Schirmer’s test, TBUT, CIC Corneal sensitivity score, subjective symptom score Improvement in symptom score, surface staining scores & TBUT at 4 weeksa
Noble[19] 2004 Randomized controlled crossover trial 16 3 50 RB & FS surface staining, Schirmer’s test, fluorescein clearance test, subjective symptom score, CIC Improvement in symptom score and impression cytology grading favoring ASb
Kojima[20] 2005 RCT 23 0.5 20 RB & FS surface staining, Schirmer’s test, TBUT, subjective symptom score Improvement in surface staining, TBUT and subjective symptom score favoring ASb
Noda- Tsuruya[21] 2006 RCT 27 6 NA RB & FS surface staining, Schirmer’s test, TBUT & subjective symptom scores Improvement in TBUT and RB staining favoring ASb
Yoon[22] 2007 Prospective case-control study 48 2 20 RB & FS surface staining, Schirmer’s test, TBUT, CIC, corneal sensitivity score, tear clearance rate, subjective symptom score Improvement in surface staining, TBUT, grade of conjunctival squamous metaplasia, goblet cell density, and subjective symptom scoreb,c
Lee[23] 2008 Case series 23 17.3 20 Surface staining, subjective symptoms Improvement in surface staining and subjective symptomsd
Urzua[24] 2012 Double-blind RCT 12 0.5 20 Surface staining (OXFORD scale), TBUT, OSDI Improvement favoring AS in OSDI scoreb
Lopez- Garcia[25] 2013 Double-blind RCT 26 2 20 RB & FS surface staining, Schirmer’s test, TBUT, CIC, subjective symptom scores Improvement in all parameters except Schirmer’s test with treatmente
Celebi[26] 2014 Double-blind RCT 20 1 20 Surface staining (OXFORD scale), Schirmer’s test, TBUT, OSDI Improvement in symptom score (OSDI) & TBUT favoring ASb
Hussain[27] 2014 Case series 63 12 50 Surface staining (OXFORD scale), Schirmer’s test, TBUT, OSDI Improvement in surface staining, Schirmer’s test, and symptom scoref
Hwang[28] 2014 Comparative study 34 1 50 Surface staining (OXFORD scale), Schirmer’s test, TBUT, subjective symptom score Improvement in all parameters in the patients with primary Sjogren syndromeg
Liu[29] 2015 Case series 28 42.3 20 RB & FS surface staining, Schirmer’s test, TBUT Improvement in surface staining scores & TBUTb,h
Mahelkova[30] 2017 Case series 26 3 20 Surface staining (OXFORD scale), OSDI, IVCM Improvement in surface staining, OSDI scores, & density of basal epithelial cells on IVCM after treatment

aBeyond 12 months of follow-up, 7 out of 14 patients maintained good response; bno differences in one or more of the other parameters studied; cgreater improvement with umbilical cord serum compared to autologous serum in symptom score, surface staining and goblet cell density; donly descriptive statistics were used for analysis; emore improvement in group where sodium hyaluronate was used as diluent, compared to group where saline was used as diluent; fpotential confounding factor: concomitant use of scleral contact lenses by 33% of patients; gno improvement in parameters in patients with secondary Sjogren’s syndrome; hpotential confounding factor: concomitant use of punctal plugs by 12 patients