Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 25;10(7):4172–4184. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1673

TABLE 4.

Effects of interventions.

Study Effect size Confidence interval Effect of intervention

Álvarez‐Barbosa et al. (2014)

mobility and lower limb performance; TUG (p = <0.001), 30 s‐CSTS (p = 0.006) 95%

Increase in performance

increases in peak power, number of repetitions

HRQoL (EQ‐5D) mobility (p < 0.001), EQ‐5D utility (p < 0.001), EQ‐5DVAS (p = 0.014) increase in HRQoL
Barthel Index (p = 0.003) increase in ADL
postural stability (p > 0.05) no significant effect
Rezola‐Pardo et al. (2020)

multicomponent group:

short physical performance battery (p < 0.01)

gait speed test (p < 0.01)

chair stand (p < 0.001)

arm curl (p < 0.001)

Timed up and Go Test (TUG) (p < 0.05)

Berg Balance Scale (BBS) (p < 0.05)

95%

improvement

improvement

improvement

improvement

improvement

improvement

walking group:

short physical performance battery

gait speed test

chair stand

arm curl

TUG

BBS

no significant effect

no significant effect

no significant effect

no significant effect

no significant effect

no significant effect

Both groups

Goldberg Anxiety and Depression Scale (p < 0.05)

Quality of Life Alzheimer's Disease Scale (p < 0.01)

Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test

Montreal Cognitive Assessment test

de Jong‐Gierveld loneliness scale

reduction in anxiety

increase in quality of life

no significant effect

no significant effect

no significant effect

Lobo et al. (2010)

aerobic training, strength training (p < 0.05)

health education

95%

Increase in physical activity (vs. control group and vs. baseline)

increase in cardiovascular variables

no significant effect

aerobic training, strength training, health education HRQoL no significant effect
strength training (p < 0.05) increase in the following: lower body strength (vs. baseline; vs. after intervention), upper body strength (vs. baseline; vs. after intervention), aerobic endurance (vs. control group), lower body flexibility (vs. baseline; vs. after intervention), upper body flexibility (vs. baseline), agility/dynamic balance
aerobic training (p < 0.05) improvement in aerobic endurance (vs. baseline, control group), lower body strength (vs. control group, baseline, HE), agility/dynamic balance (vs. control group, HE, baseline, after intervention), BMI (vs. control group HE)
health education no significant effect

Quehenberger et al. (2014)

1 year follow‐up

HRQoL (EQ‐5D) N/A no significant effect
p = 0.02 subjective health status (vs. baseline)
p = 0.047 reduction in reported pain and discomfort (baseline to follow‐up)
p = 0.26 reported problems with pain and discomfort, no significant effect (intervention period)

Hewitt et al. (2018)

incidence rate ratio = 0.45 95% reduction in the rate of falls
p = 0.02 increase in physical performance
QoL, cognition no significant effect

Stanmore et al. (2019)

p = 0.007 95% reduction in fear of falling
p = 0.02 reduction in pain
p = 0.003 positive impact on balance
QoL no significant effect

Krist et al. (2013)

p = 0.005 95% increase in mobility
p = 0,027 increase in number of sit‐up repetitions
p < or = 0,008 increase in muscle strength
QoL (p = 0,29) no significant effect
physical functioning (p = 0.54) no significant effect
Bell et al. (2011) very limited and sporadic in Control, Autonomy, Self‐Realization and Pleasure‐19 (CASP‐19), Social Provisions Scale (SPA), Modified Falls Efficacy Scale (M‐FES) 95% no significant effect

Mouton et al. (2017)

p = 0.04 after intervention, p = 0.03 after 3 months 95% increase in physical activity
p = 0.01 after intervention, p = 0.02 after 3 months increase in energy expenditure/day
p < 0.05 after 3 months increases in QoL, balance and gait, ankle strength

Özyemişci‐Taşkiran et al. (2014)

p = 0.026 (subcategory QoL) 95% decrease in sleep problems (increase in sleep quality) (yoga)
p = 0.037 (subcategory QoL) decrease in emotional reaction (yoga)
p = 0.017 increase in hand grip strength (yoga)
p = 0.019 increase in sit and reach performance (yoga)
after 6 months no persistent effect

Note: The bold term quality of life results refers the bold values in the table. The mobility results are the other values in the table.