Table 3.
Differences in large-scale within-network FC.
ROI-wise FC (SCH > HC) | t | P |
---|---|---|
PREC (R)–AMYG (R) | −4.28 | 0.000 |
pHIPPO (L)–AMYG (L) | −4.19 | 0.000 |
aHIPPO (R)–PREC (R) | −4.10 | 0.000 |
PREC (R)–PHC (R) | −4.00 | 0.000 |
aHIPPO (R)–PREC (L) | −3.85 | 0.000 |
OFC (L)–PRC (R) | −3.84 | 0.000 |
PREC (R)–AMYG (L) | −3.80 | 0.000 |
RSC (L)–PCC (R) | −3.75 | 0.000 |
aHIPPO (L)–pHIPPO (L) | −3.73 | 0.000 |
RSC (R)–PCC (R) | −3.66 | 0.000 |
pHIPPO (L)–OFC (L) | −3.55 | 0.000 |
OFC (R)–PRC (R) | −3.47 | 0.001 |
PREC (L)–PHC (R) | −3.45 | 0.001 |
aHIPPO (R)–ANG (L) | −3.37 | 0.001 |
PREC (L)–AMYG (L) | −3.35 | 0.001 |
PREC, precuneus; AMYG, amygdala; pHIPPO, posterior hippocampus; aHIPPO, anterior hippocampus; PHC, parahippocampal cortex; OFC, orbitofrontal cortex; PRC, perirhinal cortex; RSC, retrosplenial cortex; PCC, posterior cingulate cortex; ANG, angular gyrus; L, left; R, right; SCH, schizophrenia group; HC, healthy control group; FC, functional connectivity; ROI, region of interest.