Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 5;13:1193962. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1193962

Table 3.

The subgroup analysis of prognostic role of SII for PFS in OC.

Subgroups No. of studies No. of patients Effects model HR (95%CI) p Heterogeneity
I2 (%) Ph
Total 6 1,546 REM 2.71 (1.78-4.12) <0.001 65.5 0.013
Country
China 3 763 REM 3.41 (1.85-6.27) <0.001 64.0 0.062
Italy 2 734 FEM 1.61 (1.04-2.48) 0.032 33.0 0.022
India 1 49 3.70 (2.18-6.29) <0.001
Sample size
<200 3 259 FEM 2.90 (2.12-3.98) <0.001 0 0.535
≥200 3 1,287 REM 2.63 (1.00-6.93) 0.050 83.6 0.002
Treatment
Chemotherapy 3 532 REM 2.29 (1.24-4.21) 0.008 72.4 0.027
Surgery 2 912 REM 3.93 (1.14-13.56) 0.030 82.3 0.017
Surgery + chemotherapy 1 102 2.59 (1.47-4.55) 0.001
Study center
Single center 5 1,171 FEM 3.05 (2.33-3.98) <0.001 44.7 0.124
Multicenter 1 375 1.25 (0.69-2.26) 0.459
Cut-off value
<720 3 710 REM 3.85 (2.20-6.73) <0.001 59.1 0.087
≥720 3 836 FEM 1.91 (1.36-2.70) <0.001 37.6 0.201

PFS, progression-free survival; SII, systemic immune-inflammation index; OC, ovarian cancer; FEM, fixed-effects model; REM, random-effects model.

"-" means blank.