Table 5.
Relative effect sizes (RRs with 95% Cs) for psychotherapies on suicidal behaviour according to network meta-analysis
| TAU | |||||||||
| 1.01 (0.41, 2.46) | CTBE | ||||||||
| 1.60 (0.88, 2.90) | 1.59 (0.57, 4.42) | Mixed | |||||||
| 1.17 (0.68, 2.00) | 1.16 (0.48, 2.83) | 0.73 (0.36, 1.50) | PDP | ||||||
| 0.74 (0.26, 2.13) | 0.74 (0.20, 2.67) | 0.46 (0.15, 1.45) | 0.64 (0.25, 1.61) | GT | |||||
| 1.13 (0.72, 1.77) | 1.12 (0.50, 2.53) | 0.71 (0.37, 1.36) | 0.97 (0.62, 1.52) | 1.52 (0.55, 4.21) | DBT | ||||
| 1.18 (0.52, 2.67) | 1.17 (0.50, 2.74) | 0.74 (0.29, 1.89) | 1.01 (0.48, 2.11) | 1.59 (0.49, 5.17) | 1.04 (0.51, 2.15) | TFP | |||
| 3.71 (0.32, 43.59) | 3.69 (0.31, 43.77) | 2.32 (0.19, 28.50) | 3.18 (0.28, 36.42) | 4.99 (0.37, 67.66) | 3.28 (0.29, 37.46) | 3.14 (0.31, 32.14) | ST | ||
| 1.36 (0.34, 5.47) | 1.35 (0.28, 6.64) | 0.85 (0.21, 3.43) | 1.17 (0.33, 4.09) | 1.83 (0.79, 4.27) | 1.21 (0.32, 4.60) | 1.15 (0.27, 5.00) | 0.37 (0.02, 5.73) | MBT | |
| 1.22 (0.60, 2.46) | 1.21 (0.41, 3.61) | 0.76 (0.31, 1.87) | 1.04 (0.45, 2.41) | 1.64 (0.49, 5.52) | 1.08 (0.50, 2.31) | 1.03 (0.37, 2.89) | 0.33 (0.03, 4.17) | 0.89 (0.20, 4.08) | CBT |
CBT, cognitive behaviour therapy; CTBE, community treatment by experts; DBT, dialectical behaviour therapy; GT, generic treatments; MBT, mentalisation-based therapy; Mixed, mixed therapeutic techniques; PDP, psychodynamic psychotherapy; ST, schema therapy; TAU, treatment-as-usual; TFP, transference-focused therapy.
The diagonal illustrates the different nodes that were examined in this study. Comparisons between treatments should be read from left to right, and the estimate is in the cell in common between the column-defining treatment and the row-defining treatment. Relative risks (RRs with 95% CIs) smaller than 1 favour the column-defining treatment. To obtain RRs for comparisons in the opposite direction, reciprocals should be taken. Data underlined is statistically significant.
Efficacy at post-test (RR with 95%CI).