Table 3.
Biosafety infrastructure priorities
Biosafety infrastructure priorities | |
---|---|
Human factor | |
Training | • GMPP including regular updates on new information. |
• Awareness of “dual use” or “gain of function” research and the adverse implications of these activities | |
Reliability and competency | • Best practice for demonstrating or assessing human reliability including quantitative measures of reliability |
• Demonstrating the connection between reliability, quality, and biosafety | |
• What is the best way to determine competency with infectious materials in the laboratory? | |
Cumbersome risk mitigation | • How to work safely—maybe the implementation of risk mitigation strategies makes matters worse as it does not allow easy working |
Workforce development | • Development of biosafety as a vocation supported by locally available and relevant training. |
Lack of biocontainment engineers | • Train the next generation of biocontainment engineers that will be able to provide sustainability to these facilities as well as to advise on requirements for future facilities |
Biosafety administration | |
Laboratory-acquired infection and escapes | • Development and implementation of a global laboratory-acquired infection or laboratory escape reporting system. |
Registration of laboratories | • Regulation of laboratories worldwide especially those containing highly pathogenic agents |
IBCs | • Develop a culture of IBCs to regulate and review biosafety matters within institutions. |
Biosecurity and repositories | • Ensure there is a standardized and regulated method of storing pathogens using basic biorepository principles. |
Pathogen-based issues | |
Pathogen risk groups | • Opportunity to review the value of pathogen risk groups |
GMPP, good microbiological practices and procedures; IBCs, institutional biosafety committees.