Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 5;28(2):64–71. doi: 10.1089/apb.2022.0040

Table 3.

Biosafety infrastructure priorities

Biosafety infrastructure priorities
Human factor
 Training • GMPP including regular updates on new information.
  • Awareness of “dual use” or “gain of function” research and the adverse implications of these activities
 Reliability and competency • Best practice for demonstrating or assessing human reliability including quantitative measures of reliability
  • Demonstrating the connection between reliability, quality, and biosafety
• What is the best way to determine competency with infectious materials in the laboratory?
 Cumbersome risk mitigation • How to work safely—maybe the implementation of risk mitigation strategies makes matters worse as it does not allow easy working
 Workforce development • Development of biosafety as a vocation supported by locally available and relevant training.
 Lack of biocontainment engineers • Train the next generation of biocontainment engineers that will be able to provide sustainability to these facilities as well as to advise on requirements for future facilities
Biosafety administration
 Laboratory-acquired infection and escapes • Development and implementation of a global laboratory-acquired infection or laboratory escape reporting system.
 Registration of laboratories • Regulation of laboratories worldwide especially those containing highly pathogenic agents
 IBCs • Develop a culture of IBCs to regulate and review biosafety matters within institutions.
 Biosecurity and repositories • Ensure there is a standardized and regulated method of storing pathogens using basic biorepository principles.
Pathogen-based issues
 Pathogen risk groups • Opportunity to review the value of pathogen risk groups

GMPP, good microbiological practices and procedures; IBCs, institutional biosafety committees.