Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 19;16:38. doi: 10.1186/s13047-023-00634-y

Table 2.

Differences in balance and gait patterns between the supportive footwear and minimalist footwear. Values are in centimetres

Supportive footwear Minimalist footwear Cohen’s d Interpretation P-value
mean (SD) median (IQR) mean (SD) median (IQR)
Balance
 Postural sway, eyes open on the floor 172 (335) 81 (77) 135 (152) 78 (88) 0.14 small 0.320*
 Postural sway, eyes closed on the floor 88 (46) 74 (76) 68 (56) 47 (52) 0.36 medium 0.057*
 Postural sway, eyes open on the foam 663 (619) 460 (566) 533 (385) 456 (434) 0.26 medium 0.099*
 Postural sway, eyes closed on the foam 3,824 (8,146) 913 (737) 4,750 (6,062) 1,405 (13,202) 0.13 small 0.324†
 Near tandem stance 929 (972) 429 (955) 760 (878) 514 (522) 0.19 small 0.204*
Walking stability
 Walking stability, treadmill 3,891 (2,917) 2,745 (2,175) 16,377 (53,923) 2,809 (2,134) 0.34 medium 0.157†
 Walking stability, level surface 20,264 (16,077) 13,395 (12,703) 24,060 (28,598) 14,301 (10,661) 0.17 small 0.236†
 Walking stability, irregular surface 21,812 (12,398) 17,364 (12,256) 29,463 (32,038) 16,526 (10,870) 0.32 medium 0.141†

SD Standard deviation, IQR Interquartile range

*Non-significant improvement with minimalist footwear

Non-significant improvement with supportive footwear