Bohadana 2000.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Study design: parallel RCT Country: France Recruitment: community volunteers |
|
Participants | 400 smokers, 18 to 70 years, > 10 cigarettes per day, > 1 previous quit attempt, motivated 49% men, average cigarettes per day: Group 1: 26.1, Group 2: 23.5; FTND > 6 Participants required to be motivated to quit | |
Interventions | 1) Nicotine inhaler, 26 weeks, combined with nicotine patch (15 mg/16‐hour) for first 6 weeks, placebo patch for next 6 weeks 2) Nicotine inhaler, 26 weeks, placebo patch for first 12 weeks | |
Outcomes | Sustained abstinence at 12 months (prolonged from week 2, no slips allowed)
Validation: CO < 10 ppm at each visit (2 weeks, 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months)
(Study also reports respiratory symptoms and pulmonary function tests for completely abstinent participants) Adverse events: measured to 1‐year follow‐up (treatment ceased at 6 months) |
|
Notes | Gender subgroup results reported 2003
This study was supported by a grant from Pharmacia and Upjohn Consumer Healthcare. Conflicts of interest: not reported |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "computer‐generated randomization code" |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "sealed randomization envelopes were provided for each subject and were held by the hospital pharmacy, which was responsible for dispensing medication" |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Described as double‐blind |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Losses over 12 months were steep but similar in both groups, i.e. 148 from NRT group and 155 from placebo group. Losses counted as continuing smokers |